Advance Search
ZHANG Sheng, WANG Chao, WANG Deli. Two kinds of artificial joint replacement versus proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail in treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(22): 113-116. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212208
Citation: ZHANG Sheng, WANG Chao, WANG Deli. Two kinds of artificial joint replacement versus proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail in treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(22): 113-116. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212208
shu

Two kinds of artificial joint replacement versus proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail in treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture

  • Department of Bone Joints, Shenzhen Hospital of Peking University, Shenzhen, Guangdong, 518000

More Information
  • Received Date: May 26, 2021
  • Available Online: December 03, 2021
  • Published Date: November 27, 2021
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  •   Objective  To compare the effects of biological prosthetic joint replacement, bone cement prosthetic joint replacement and proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail (PFNA) in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture.
      Methods  A total of 120 elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture were selected as research objects, and divided into biological group (given with biological prosthesis artificial joint replacement, 29 cases) and bone cement group (given bone cement prosthetic artificial joint replacement, 30 cases) and PFNA group (treated with PFNA, 61 cases) according to the different treatments. The treatment effects of the three groups were compared.
      Results  The amount of intraoperative blood loss in the biological group and the bone cement group was larger than that of the PFNA group, the operation time was longer than the PFNA group, the hospitalization cost was higher than the PFNA group, and the bed time and hospital stay were shorter than the PFNA group (P < 0.05). At 1 month, 6 and 12 months after surgery, the Visual Analogue Scale scores of the biological group and the bone cement group were lower than that of the PFNA group, and the Harris score was higher than that of the PFNA group (P < 0.05). The excellent and good rate of clinical efficacy in the biological group and the bone cement group was higher than that in the PFNA group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the incidence of complications among three groups (P>0.05).
      Conclusion  Biological prosthetic joint replacement and bone cement prosthetic joint replacement have better clinical effects than PFNA treatment for elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures, but PFNA internal fixation therapy has less intraoperative blood loss, shorter operation time and lower treatment cost.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (10)
  • [1]
    ZHAO K, ZHANG J, LI J, et al. Incidence and risk factors of surgical site infection after intertrochanteric fracture surgery: a prospective cohort study[J]. Int Wound J, 2020, 17(6): 1871-1880. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13477
    [2]
    夏涛. 双动半髋关节置换术与内固定术治疗老年股骨转子间骨折的中期疗效对比[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2018, 22(22): 52-55, 58. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201822017
    [3]
    FRANZEN T, TIBBLING L I, HÄGG M K. Oral neuromuscular training relieves hernia-related dysphagia and GERD symptoms as effectively in obese as in non-obese patients[J]. Acta Otolaryngol, 2018, 138(11): 1004-1008. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2018.1503715
    [4]
    郑刚, 李万海. 外固定支具与股骨远端非接触桥接钢板倒置对股骨近端良性骨肿瘤髋关节功能及安全性的影响[J]. 中国肿瘤临床与康复, 2020, 27(2): 189-192. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGZK202002023.htm
    [5]
    于晓光, 赵振栓, 提琳, 等. 外侧入路与后外侧入路下生物型长柄假体人工髋关节置换治疗老年性股骨转子间不稳定性骨折疗效比较[J]. 中国临床医生杂志, 2019, 47(7): 827-829. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-8552.2019.07.024
    [6]
    于晓光, 李军, 提琳, 等. 骨水泥型长柄双极假体人工髋关节置换治疗老年性股骨转子间不稳定性骨折[J]. 中国医刊, 2019, 54(7): 775-777. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-1070.2019.07.025
    [7]
    韩张杰. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉与动力髋螺钉内固定治疗老年人股骨转子间骨折的效果比较[J]. 中国基层医药, 2018, 25(21): 2758-2760. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1008-6706.2018.21.010
    [8]
    刘代忠, 李强, 邓立庆. 全髋双动置换术与PFNA在治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效比较[J]. 河北医科大学学报, 2020, 41(5): 554-557. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-3205.2020.05.014
    [9]
    薄舒心, 王倩, 陈萍. 生物型人工股骨头置换术和PFNA内固定术治疗老年Evansⅲ Ⅳ型股骨转子间骨折效果对比[J]. 河北医学, 2020, 26(2): 259-263. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6233.2020.02.021
    [10]
    朱双印, 刘珈, 谷福顺, 等. 益气活血通便汤预防老年股骨粗隆间骨折单臂外固定术后患者深静脉血栓临床观察[J]. 西部中医药, 2019, 32(9): 72-74. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-6852.2019.09.020
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]JIA Chuan, YU Weizhong, WANG Yuchen, QIAN Zhipeng, HE Zhangning, ZHU Wenke. Proximal femoral bionic intramedullary nail versus InterTAN intramedullary nail in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(21): 88-91. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232369
    [2]HUANG Yejian, TAO Minggao, YAN Shixian, GENG Yuqiang. Effect of internal fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation in treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(4): 64-67. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214312
    [3]ZHU Jia, XIA Xianqiang, ZHAO Shitie, YANG Xinshu, HAN Xiaodong. Effect of internal fixation with proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in patients with femoral intertrochanteric fractures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(22): 103-106. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202022030
    [4]SI Zhengtao, YANG Yongqiang. Internal fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation versus internal fixation with dynamic hip screw in treatment of patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(3): 105-107. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202003030
    [5]LIU Qianxing, HE Dizhen. Effect of percutaneous anti-rotation of the proximal femoral nail internal fixation on hip joint function and quality of life in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(21): 88-91. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201921025
    [6]SHAO Fang. Effect of early operation with proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail on the prognosis of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(16): 86-88, 92. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201916023
    [7]LIAN Yangjie. Proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail versus proximal femoral locking plate in the treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, (6): 103-106. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201906027
    [8]ZU Guangjun, YAO Shixiang, XIA Jiping. Effect of proximal femoral nail antirotation on treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (1): 88-90. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201801027
    [9]JIANG Zhigang, MA Zhaolong, YANG Wengui. Application of external fixator and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (11): 59-61,69. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201611017
    [10]CHEN Sen. Clinical observation of the intertrochanteric fracture treat by artificial total hip arthroplasty and proximal femoral nail[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (16): 18-20. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201316007

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (240) PDF downloads (12) Cited by()
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    © 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部

    Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807

    苏公网安备 32100302010246号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return