HUANG Yejian, TAO Minggao, YAN Shixian, GENG Yuqiang. Effect of internal fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation in treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(4): 64-67. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214312
Citation: HUANG Yejian, TAO Minggao, YAN Shixian, GENG Yuqiang. Effect of internal fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation in treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(4): 64-67. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214312

Effect of internal fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation in treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture

More Information
  • Received Date: November 01, 2021
  • Available Online: March 21, 2022
  • Published Date: February 27, 2022
  •   Objective  To observe the effect of internal fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation (PFNA) in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture.
      Methods  A total of 134 patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture were selected and randomly divided into observation group (66 cases, treated with internal fixation with PFNA) and control group [68 cases, treated with proximal femoral locking plate (PFLP)]. The perioperative indexes, score of joint function (Harris score), score of activities of daily living (ADL), rehabilitation indexes and complications were compared between the two groups.
      Results  The perioperative indexes of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group (P < 0.05); the Harris scores at 1 month and 2 months after operation in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (P < 0.05); the ADL scores at 1 month, 2 month and 3 months after operation in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The hospital stay and time to bed-off activity in the observation group were significantly shorter than those in the control group (P < 0.05); the fracture healing time in the observation group was slightly shorter than that in the control group (P>0.05). The total incidence of complications in the observation group was 6.06%, which was significantly lower than 20.59% in the control group (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion  Both PFNA and PFLP can effectively treat the elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture, but the internal fixation with PFNA is better than the internal fixation with PFLP in comprehensive efficacy, and physiological function of joint recovers faster in the early stage after internal fixation with PFNA.
  • [1]
    张宜朝, 谢威. PFNA与HA治疗高龄不稳定股骨粗隆间骨折的早期临床结果比较[J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(9): 1505-1509. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2020.09.030
    [2]
    胡淑娜, 童德明. 全身麻醉与椎管内麻醉对高龄股骨粗隆间骨折患者术后恢复效果的影响[J]. 中国社区医师, 2018, 34(18): 18-20. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-614x.2018.18.008
    [3]
    魏国光. 中医结合快速康复理念对老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者血清炎性因子的影响及应用效果[J]. 中国老年学杂志, 2020, 40(17): 3683-3685. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9202.2020.17.031
    [4]
    林荣侯, 刘勇, 隋丽娟, 等. InterTAN、PFNA、DHS治疗不稳定性股骨粗隆间骨折的比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2020, 28(6): 507-511. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJXS202006007.htm
    [5]
    王亚平, 郑光峰, 杨晓萍. 知信行教育在老年股骨粗隆间骨折术后的应用[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2019, 27(23): 2190-2192. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJXS201923021.htm
    [6]
    胡小军, 谭响, 谢继勇, 等. 关节镜辅助下闭合复位经皮Herbert空心螺钉内固定治疗胫骨远端Salter-Harris Ⅲ、Ⅳ型骨骺骨折临床研究[J]. 重庆医学, 2020, 49(20): 3395-3398. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-8348.2020.20.017
    [7]
    朱滨, 华贤章, 王立祚, 等. 关节镜辅助下微创治疗外侧闭合性胫骨平台骨折31例体会[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2019, 25(8): 756-758. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SGKZ201908021.htm
    [8]
    刘永起. PFNa与股骨近端解剖型锁定钢板治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床研究[J]. 中国全科医学, 2019, 22(S2): 93-95. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-QKYX2019S2032.htm
    [9]
    何燕倩, 阮兢, 冯国栋, 等. 股骨粗隆间骨折术后早期负重在适宜人群中的效果[J]. 中国康复理论与实践, 2020, 26(8): 955-959. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9771.2020.08.015
    [10]
    赵忠胜, 林斌, 付长龙, 等. 下肢可调负重支具在股骨粗隆间骨折术后康复中的应用[J]. 中华中医药杂志, 2019, 34(5): 1932-1937. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BXYY201905018.htm
    [11]
    李安澜, 曹翠香, 仲海燕, 等. 髓内固定与半髋置换治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折比较[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2020, 28(22): 2036-2040. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJXS202022007.htm
    [12]
    陈少坚, 林臻, 刘清平, 等. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉近端两种锁定方式治疗Evans-JensenⅣ/Ⅴ型股骨粗隆间骨折的效果[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019, 35(19): 3027-3032. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2019.19.011
    [13]
    张轩轩, 李宝丰, 章莹, 等. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉与髋关节置换术治疗高龄股骨粗隆间骨折Meta分析[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019, 35(6): 903-907. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2019.06.013
    [14]
    洪石, 吴征杰, 李灿辉. 机器人辅助下股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗股骨粗隆间骨折8例[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019, 35(2): 335-336. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2019.02.039
    [15]
    李祥义, 王汝武, 毕超, 等. 股骨近端防旋髓内钉内固定治疗老年不稳定性股骨粗隆间骨折53例临床观察[J]. 山东医药, 2020, 60(34): 85-87. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2020.34.021
    [16]
    宋晓杰, 何举仁, 申军国, 等. PFNA内固定联合个体化康复训练治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效[J]. 山东医药, 2020, 60(13): 76-78. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-266X.2020.13.022
  • Related Articles

    [1]JIA Chuan, YU Weizhong, WANG Yuchen, QIAN Zhipeng, HE Zhangning, ZHU Wenke. Proximal femoral bionic intramedullary nail versus InterTAN intramedullary nail in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(21): 88-91. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232369
    [2]ZHANG Sheng, WANG Chao, WANG Deli. Two kinds of artificial joint replacement versus proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail in treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(22): 113-116. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212208
    [3]TANG Daibin, ZHU Ping, SUN Jinya, ZHU Xiaokong, YANG Jinghui, SU Ping, SUN Deyong, YAN Xiufang, ZHAO Wei. Effect of coagulation disorders on score of Activity of Daily Living in patients with heat stroke[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(24): 80-84. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202024024
    [4]SI Zhengtao, YANG Yongqiang. Internal fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation versus internal fixation with dynamic hip screw in treatment of patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(3): 105-107. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202003030
    [5]LIU Qianxing, HE Dizhen. Effect of percutaneous anti-rotation of the proximal femoral nail internal fixation on hip joint function and quality of life in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(21): 88-91. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201921025
    [6]SHAO Fang. Effect of early operation with proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail on the prognosis of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(16): 86-88, 92. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201916023
    [7]WEI Shuyi, LI Tongxiang. Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus internal fixation with locking plate in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(7): 87-90. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201907023
    [8]JIANG Zhigang, MA Zhaolong, YANG Wengui. Application of external fixator and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (11): 59-61,69. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201611017
    [9]YE Caixia, LIU Jiarui, CHEN Jie. Influence of pain-improving nursing on activity of daily living in patients with total hip replacement[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (10): 106-108. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201410038
    [10]GE Meihong, XIAO Yuhua, ZHU Yuhui. Influence of early rehabilitation intervention on daily living activities of patients with severe stroke[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (20): 26-29. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201320009

Catalog

    Article views (236) PDF downloads (15) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return