LIU Guoli, WANG Haonan, TIAN Dehu. Curative effect of conservative versus surgical treatment for tendinous mallet finger deformity and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(4): 68-72. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212711
Citation: LIU Guoli, WANG Haonan, TIAN Dehu. Curative effect of conservative versus surgical treatment for tendinous mallet finger deformity and its influencing factors[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(4): 68-72. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212711

Curative effect of conservative versus surgical treatment for tendinous mallet finger deformity and its influencing factors

More Information
  • Received Date: July 04, 2021
  • Available Online: March 21, 2022
  • Published Date: February 27, 2022
  •   Objective  To compare the clinical effect of conservative treatment and surgical treatment of mallet finger and to analyze the factors affecting the treatment effect.
      Methods  A total of 108 cases with tendinous mallet finger deformity were collected and divided into conservative treatment group(n=54) and surgical treatment group(n=54) according to treatment methods. The conservative treatment group was immobilized with braces for 6 to 8 weeks and instructed for functional exercise, while the surgical treatment group received surgical treatment (longus tendon sheet graft transplantation, extensor tendon insertion reconstruction and direct extensor tendon suture were used respectively according to different injuries), and the patients were protected and fixed with plaster for 6 weeks and underwent functional exercise. The patients of two groups were followed up and compared in terms of wounded finger motion, under-extension angle, pain and complications. The treatment effects of the two groups were evaluated comprehensively by Dargan functional assessment method, and the factors affecting the treatment effect were analyzed by correlation analysis method.
      Results  The follow-up time was 5 to 8 months in the conservative treatment group, and 4 to 8 months in the surgical treatment group, with average of 6.3 months, and 6.8 months, respectively. The excellent and good rate of the conservative treatment group was 81.48%, and 87.04% in the surgical treatment group, but there was no significant difference in the excellent and good rate between the two groups (P>0.05). The time from injury to treatment was correlated with the curative effect in conservative treatment group (P < 0.05), while efficacy had no correlations with age and injuries fingers (P>0.05). There were no significant correlations of the time from injury to treatment, age, injuries fingers with efficacy in the surgical treatment group (P>0.05). The excellent and good rate of direct extensor tendon suture in the surgical treatment group was higher than the other two methods, but the difference was not statistically significant (P>0.05).
      Conclusion  For patients with tendinous mallet finger deformity, brace fixation is the priority for conservative treatment, but surgery is recommended for those with more than 3 weeks of injuries. The failure of conservative treatment does not affect the postoperative outcomes of surgical treatment.
  • [1]
    李友, 巨积辉, 熊胜, 等. 原位伸肌腱止点重建治疗腱性锤状指畸形[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2018, 34(5): 333-335. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2018.05.005
    [2]
    张玉军, 巨积辉, 周广良, 等. 三种治疗骨性锤状指手术方式的疗效分析[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2018, 34(1): 24-26. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2018.01.010
    [3]
    施劲, 王骏. 锤状指保守治疗效果及影响因素的分析[J]. 中国康复医学杂志, 2017, 32(7): 826-828. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-1242.2017.07.020
    [4]
    张亚楠, 朱磊, 李淑媛, 等. 掌侧支具在急性闭合性锤状指中的应用[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2012, 28(2): 67-69. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2012.02.002
    [5]
    潘勇卫, 田光磊, 李淳, 等. 改良支具固定治疗陈旧腱性锤状指[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2010, 26(6): 328-331.
    [6]
    都巍, 李雄峰, 章伟祥, 等. 不同手术方法治疗DoyleⅠ型锤状指的临床疗效比较研究[J]. 浙江创伤外科, 2019, 24(5): 1018-1019. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7147.2019.05.074
    [7]
    刘欢, 李崇杰, 梁晓旭, 等. 锤状指手术治疗方法的探讨[J]. 实用手外科杂志, 2018, 32(3): 300-301. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-2722.2018.03.013
    [8]
    李春江. 腱-骨片移植法重建止点治疗腱性锤状指[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2016, 32(3): 236-238. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2016.03.033
    [9]
    李海雷, 李大村, 刘井达, 等. 微型骨锚联合腱片移植修复指伸肌腱止点损伤[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2017, 33(3): 237-238. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2017.03.034
    [10]
    周晓玲, 李学渊, 胡浩良, 等. 手术治疗与短指支具保守治疗腱性闭合性锤状指疗效比较的回顾性研究[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2019, 35(5): 337-339. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2019.05.007
    [11]
    陆涛, 宋知非, 任杰. Ⅰ区伸肌腱断裂锤状指保守疗法疗效不佳的探讨[J]. 中华创伤骨科杂志, 2005, 7(9): 891-892. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1671-7600.2005.09.028
    [12]
    李程科, 吴祥, 肖军波, 等. 自体指深屈肌腱转位修复Ⅰ区指伸肌腱缺损锤状指[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2019, 35(5): 340-342. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2019.05.008
    [13]
    贾杰, 魏智辉, 陈伟, 等. 经骨隧道线扣技术腱骨缝合治疗腱性锤状指[J]. 中华手外科杂志, 2018, 34(5): 336-337. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1005-054X.2018.05.006
    [14]
    胡燕青, 蒋海, 李棋, 等. 不同肌腱缝合方法的生物力学比较研究[J]. 中国修复重建外科杂志, 2017, 31(10): 1208-1213. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZXCW201710010.htm
    [15]
    赵占稳. 陈旧性腱性锤状指的显微外科手术治疗[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2008, 16(24): 1898-1899. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJXS200824024.htm
  • Related Articles

    [1]FAN Wenchao, CHEN Zhangmei, XU Jian, YANG Hongjun, WANG Sen, LIU Yuan. Effect of sickle-shaped small needle knife minimally invasive therapy for patients with stenosing tenosynovitis of flexor tendon of finger[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(11): 79-83. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20240892
    [2]KANG Cong, WANG Zhe, CUI Jijun. Efficacy of minimally invasive Achilles tendon repair assisted by porous metal plates in the treatment of acute closed Achilles tendon rupture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(21): 78-82. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232656
    [3]HE Wenjun, YANG Guanghui, JIANG Zhengyu. Effect of reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament with modified peroneus longus tendon on foot function[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(1): 104-107. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20222809
    [4]ZHANG Hao, LIANG Dongxing, LIU Tao, TIAN Yuan, SHI Xiaolin, YANG Yongming. Effect of modified percutaneous minimally invasive repair surgery in treatment of patients with acute closed rupture of Achilles's tendon[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(20): 102-105. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212251
    [5]ZHANG Jiale, LIANG Yuan, WANG Jingcheng. Research progress on tendon adhesion[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(12): 119-123. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210839
    [6]HUANG Weifeng, XU Yongqiu, WANG Pengyun, HUANG Hao, CHEN Yinghua, QING Haiyang, LI Li. Effect of autologous platelet rich plasma on tendon-bone healing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(12): 28-31. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20211542
    [7]JIA Zhike, GUO Yinji, YIN Ercheng. Effect observation of coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction by metatarsalis tendon combined with hook plate in the treatment of patients with acromioclavicular joint dislocation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(13): 41-43. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202013012
    [8]YAN Zhiyuan, HE Junwei, HU Xiaolong, JIANG Yonggang, LIU Bolin. Application of fumigation and washing with traditional Chinese medicine in reconstruction of autogenous peroneus brevis tendon in the treatment of chronic lateral ankle instability[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(10): 106-109. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202010027
    [9]MA Yinghui, DAI Hao, LI Zhi, WANG Lingchun, MAO Jianying, LU Lingling, ZHAI Weitao. Relationship between rheumatoid arthritis flatfoot and flexor pollicis longus tendon lesion[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (21): 68-70. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201721020
    [10]MAO Yulun, ZHOU Qiang, ZHANG Pingchao. Comparative study of autologous and allogeneic tendon for reconstruction of the ligaments of the lateral ankle by minimally invasive transplantation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (17): 59-62. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201417017
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(7)

    1. 毕生龙,刘荣,丁称生,李帆. 预防性静脉推注去甲肾上腺素对剖宫产腰硬联合麻醉后产妇低血压及母婴的影响. 中国妇幼保健. 2023(16): 2971-2974 .
    2. 陈远标,王菁,周敏,张龙新,魏颖. 超声定位L_2~L_3和L_3~L_4间隙腰硬联合麻醉在剖宫产术中麻醉效果的比较. 中国当代医药. 2023(31): 125-128 .
    3. 孙小华,何敏燕,马玲. 双下肢弹力绷带应用于剖宫产椎管内麻醉后低血压的预防效果观察. 临床护理杂志. 2022(02): 28-30 .
    4. 武辉,陈素娟,刘恒,李敬,杨英英,侯青霞. 子宫托举装置用于防治剖宫产术中仰卧位低血压综合征的临床效果. 保健医学研究与实践. 2022(06): 18-21 .
    5. 黄敏坚,黄贞. 右美托咪定对使用血管活性药防治仰卧位低血压产妇肾功能的影响. 基层医学论坛. 2021(19): 2696-2698 .
    6. 陈火惠. 护理干预对剖腹产仰卧位低血压综合征的预防机制. 心血管病防治知识. 2021(35): 47-50 .
    7. 胡春霞,方羽. 三种不同体位对剖宫产产妇血流动力学变化的影响观察. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志. 2021(31): 7-10 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (351) PDF downloads (21) Cited by(8)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return