Advance Search
HE Peng, LI Yongfei, WU Yiyun, REN Xiaomei, BIAN Weihe, YAO Chang. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted rotary resection versus open resection in treatment of breast masses with calcification[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(22): 13-16. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20213302
Citation: HE Peng, LI Yongfei, WU Yiyun, REN Xiaomei, BIAN Weihe, YAO Chang. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted rotary resection versus open resection in treatment of breast masses with calcification[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(22): 13-16. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20213302
shu

Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted rotary resection versus open resection in treatment of breast masses with calcification

  • 1.

    Department of Breast Surgery, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029

  • 2.

    Department of Ultrasound Medicine, Jiangsu Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029

More Information
  • Received Date: August 15, 2021
  • Available Online: November 11, 2021
  • Published Date: November 27, 2021
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  •   Objective   To compare the effect of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted rotary resection and open resection in the treatment of breast masses with calcification.
      Methods   The clinical data of patients with calcified breast masses was analyzed. According to different surgical methods, they were divided into rotary resection group (45 cases) and open resection group (43 cases). The rotary resection group was treated with ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted rotary resection, and the open resection group was treated with open resection. The resection rate of calcification, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, incision healing time, scar length, postoperative complications, postoperative pain score and satisfaction score were compared between the two groups.
      Results   The resection rate of calcification in the rotary resection group was 95.56%, and 100.00% in the open resection group. The operation time, incision healing time and scar length in the rotary resection group were shorter than those in the open resection group, and the amount of intraoperative bleeding was less than that in the open resection group (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in postoperative local hematoma, incision infection, shape changes and residual lesions between the two groups (P>0.05). The postoperative pain score of the rotary resection group was lower than that of the open resection group, and the satisfaction score was higher than that of the open resection group (P < 0.05).
      Conclusion   Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted rotary resection is effective in the treatment of breast masses with calcification, and has the advantages of short operation time, less bleeding, short healing time, small incision scar, mild pain and high patients′satisfaction.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (12)
  • [1]
    中国抗癌协会乳腺癌专业委员会. 中国抗癌协会乳腺癌诊治指南与规范(2019版)[J]. 中国癌症杂志, 2019, 29(8): 609-680.
    [2]
    YUAN Z, QU X, ZHANG Z T, et al. Application of localization and needle placement guided by mammographic, ultrasound and fiberoptic ductoscopy for resection of non-palpable breast lesions[J]. Anticancer Res, 2017, 37(8): 4523-4527. http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28739748
    [3]
    朱海龙, 张璇. 超声引导下微创旋切术治疗乳腺良性肿瘤的手术效果和美观效果评价[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(13): 64-66, 70. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201913018
    [4]
    VAUGHAN C L, DOUGLAS T S, SAID-HARTLEY Q, et al. Testing a dual-modality system that combines full-field digital mammography and automated breast ultrasound[J]. Clin Imaging, 2016, 40(3): 498-505. doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.11.024
    [5]
    WEIGEL S, HEINDEL W, HEIDRICH J, et al. Digital mammography screening: sensitivity of the programme dependent on breast density[J]. Eur Radiol, 2017, 27(7): 2744-2751. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4636-4
    [6]
    吴慧玲, 冼康明, 王坤林, 等. 高频超声检测乳腺钙化灶的临床应用探讨[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2020, 4(17): 161-163. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2096-3807.2020.17.090
    [7]
    ATASOY M M, TASALI N, CUBUK R, et al. Vacuum-assisted stereotactic biopsy for isolated BI-RADS 4 microcalcifications: evaluation with histopathology and midterm follow-up results[J]. Diagn Interv Radiol, 2015, 21(1): 22-27. doi: 10.5152/dir.2014.14139
    [8]
    刘静, 齐晓伟, 鲍洋秋, 等. 真空辅助微创旋切系统在乳腺肿块活组织检查中的应用[J]. 中华乳腺病杂志: 电子版, 2019, 13(1): 60-62.
    [9]
    范志民, 王建东, 华彬, 等. 超声引导下真空辅助乳腺活检手术专家共识及操作指南(2017版)[J]. 中国实用外科杂志, 2017, 37(12): 1374-1376.
    [10]
    周围, 王泽强, 郭琼, 等. 真空辅助微创旋切系统在伴粗钙化的乳腺肿块中的临床应用[J/CD]. 中华乳腺病杂志: 电子版, 2021, 15(2): 117-118.
    [11]
    KIM H S, KIM M J, KIM E K, et al. US-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications in breast lesions and long-term follow-up results[J]. Korean J Radiol, 2008, 9(6): 503-509. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2008.9.6.503
    [12]
    CHO N, MOON W K, CHA J H, et al. Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy of microcalcifications detected at screening mammography[J]. Acta Radiol, 2009, 50(6): 602-609. doi: 10.1080/02841850902933107
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]HAN Peng, ZHANG Jie, MA Yunpeng, ZHANG Chunli. Clinical effect of minimally invasive rotational curettage combined with water-assisted liposuction in treatment of gynecomastia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2025, 29(6): 80-83. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20243229
    [2]LYU Dongqin, XU Lei, ZHU Qihang, ZHU Xiansheng. Value of diaphragmatic excursion detected by ultrasound in evaluating diaphragm function recovery after lobectomy and segmentectomy with video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(5): 10-13. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214276
    [3]YANG Defu, ZHANG Hengzhu, LI Yuping, YAN Zhengcun, DONG Lun, WANG Xiaodong, ZHU Lei, WANG Xingdong. Application of a new adjustable neuroendoscope assisted sheath in minimally invasive cerebral hemorrhage[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(1): 24-28. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202001006
    [4]ZHU Hailong, ZHANG Xuan. Evaluation on therapeutic efficacy and aesthetic effect of ultrasound-guided minimally invasive surgery for benign breast tumors[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(13): 64-66, 70. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201913018
    [6]WANG Lili, WANG Pei, ZHAO Yi. Application of standardized nursing process for minimally invasive breast surgery[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (20): 63-65. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201520020
    [7]WANG Xiaoyan. Application of high vacuum drainage after parotid surgery and postoperative nursing measures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (20): 108-110. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201420034
    [8]LYU Jianxin, SHI Min, PAN Bo, WANG Xiaojun, DAI Luxian, YANG Xiaohong. Application of EnCor vacuum-assisted biopsy system in the diagnosis and treatment for breast lesions[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (9): 108-111. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201409033
    [9]KUANG Hongyi, ZHU Lili, PENG Xian. Effect of laparoscope-assisted vaginal hysterectomy on ovarian function in mid-aged and young women[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (21): 111-113. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201321032
    [10]CAI Yan, DAI Ming, HUANG Ying, XU Yang-ming, XU Yi-yun, XIE Chong-wen. Clinical application of minimally invasive surgery in resecting benign breast lumps under the guidance of color Doppler ultrasound[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2012, (17): 31-33.

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (328) PDF downloads (11) Cited by()
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    © 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部

    Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807

    苏公网安备 32100302010246号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return