LIU Qingquan, XIAO Dalei. Effect of Da Vinci robot assisted radical resection of rectal cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(13): 50-54. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214788
Citation: LIU Qingquan, XIAO Dalei. Effect of Da Vinci robot assisted radical resection of rectal cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(13): 50-54. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214788

Effect of Da Vinci robot assisted radical resection of rectal cancer

More Information
  • Received Date: December 05, 2021
  • Available Online: July 01, 2022
  • Objective 

    To compare the effect of Da Vinci robot assisted and laparoscopic assisted radical resection of rectal cancer.

    Methods 

    The clinical data of 180 patients underwent Da Vinci robot assisted or laparoscopic assisted radical resection of rectal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. SPSS 22.0 software was used to perform 1 to 1 propensity score matching (PSM) for patients, and finally 51 cases with Da Vinci robot assisted radical resection of rectal cancer (Da Vinci robot group) and 51 cases with laparoscopic assisted radical resection of rectal cancer (laparoscopic group) were included in this study. The intraoperative and postoperative conditions were compared between the two groups, and the 2-year survival condition was analyzed in both groups.

    Results 

    The operation time of the Da Vinci robot group was significantly longer than that of the laparoscopy group, while the intraoperative blood loss, the C reactive protein within 24 hours after operation and the score of the Numeric Rating Scale in the Da Vinci robot group were significantly lower than those in the time of removing urinary catheter after operation was shorter than the laparoscopic group (P < 0.05). The incidence rates of postoperative complications were 13.73% in the Da Vinci robot group and 15.69% in the laparoscopic group, and there was no significant difference between two groups (P>0.05). The median survival time of the Da Vinci robot group and the laparoscopic group were 21.9 and 21.7 months respectively, and there was no significant difference between two groups (χ2=0.495, P=0.482). The 2-year survival rate of the Da Vinci robot group was 82.35% (42/51), which showed no significant difference when compared to 76.47% (39/51) of the laparoscopic group (χ2=0.540, P=0.463).

    Conclusion 

    Da Vinci robot assisted radical resection of rectal cancer can achieve the similar radical effect and long-term effect as laparoscopic assisted radical resection of rectal cancer, but the former is more conducive to reduce intraoperative blood loss, alleviate degrees of postoperative inflammation and pain, and promote the recovery of urinary function of patients.

  • [1]
    吴军, 贾成功, 史传文. 腹腔镜与开放手术治疗结直肠癌的临床效果及预后分析[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2020, 25(11): 844-848. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FQJW202011012.htm
    [2]
    刘文涵, 闫沛静, 胡东平, 等. 机器人与腹腔镜直肠癌全系膜切除术短期疗效对比分析[J]. 中国普外基础与临床杂志, 2019, 26(1): 31-37. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZPWL201901008.htm
    [3]
    董海燕, 窦磊, 庞晓燕, 等. 机器人手术与腹腔镜手术对外科医生影响的比较[J]. 机器人外科学杂志: 中英文, 2020, 1(3): 195-201. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JQRW202003007.htm
    [4]
    中华医学会外科学分会腹腔镜与内镜外科学组, 中华医学会外科学分会结直肠外科学组, 中国医师协会外科医师分会结直肠外科医师委员会, 等. 腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术操作指南(2018版)[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2018, 17(9): 877-885. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-9752.2018.09.001
    [5]
    严广斌. NRS疼痛数字评价量表numerical rating scale[J]. 中华关节外科杂志: 电子版, 2014, 8(3): 410. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHGJ201403034.htm
    [6]
    徐舟舟, 朱晒红, 易波, 等. 达芬奇机器人手术系统与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术治疗低位直肠癌的疗效分析[J]. 中华消化外科杂志, 2020, 19(5): 537-543. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn115610-20200414-00257
    [7]
    许剑民, 常文举, 鉴谧. 达芬奇机器人直肠癌根治术的现状和发展[J]. 中华普外科手术学杂志: 电子版, 2020, 14(1): 9-12. doi: 10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-3946.2020.01.003
    [8]
    金鑫, 时飞宇, 孙祺, 等. 达芬奇机器人、腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌根治术的近期疗效对比研究[J]. 结直肠肛门外科, 2019, 25(4): 406-411. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-DCGM201904011.htm
    [9]
    吴晶. 3D腹腔镜辅助直肠癌Dixon术治疗直肠癌的疗效研究[J]. 空军医学杂志, 2019, 35(6): 482-484, 487. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJZY201906007.htm
    [10]
    卓凡, 李太原, 孙焕奎, 等. 倾向性评分匹配达芬奇机器人与腹腔镜直肠癌低位前切除术的近期疗效比较[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019, 35(9): 1468-1472. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5725.2019.09.026
    [11]
    潘婷婷, 姚翠. 快速康复外科理念在达芬奇机器人结直肠癌根治术围术期护理中的应用[J]. 腹腔镜外科杂志, 2021, 26(6): 476-477. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FQJW202106021.htm
    [12]
    王赫, 朱小龙, 刘志鹏, 等. 达芬奇机器人和腹腔镜应用于直肠癌根治术的临床疗效对比研究[J]. 中华普通外科杂志, 2020, 35(1): 4-7. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1007-631X.2020.01.002
    [13]
    张雅琦, 张弢, 宋子甲, 等. 倾向评分匹配分析机器人中低位直肠癌根治术的泌尿功能保护作用[J]. 外科理论与实践, 2020, 25(3): 245-251. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-WKLL202003020.htm
    [14]
    黄哲昆, 池畔, 黄颖. 低位直肠癌保留部分邓氏筋膜的机器人与腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术近期疗效与泌尿和勃起功能对照研究[J]. 中华胃肠外科杂志, 2021, 24(4): 327-334. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn.441530-20200724-00444
    [15]
    汤建军, 法镇中, 吴杰, 等. 腹腔镜腹会阴联合切除治疗低位直肠癌手术难度的相关因素分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2018, 22(17): 50-52. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201817014
    [16]
    周玉良, 李永翔. 机器人和腹腔镜全直肠系膜切除术保留盆腔自主神经对泌尿和性功能的影响[J]. 医药前沿, 2019, 9(19): 15-18. https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10366-1019175426.htm
    [17]
    叶善平, 时军, 刘东宁, 等. 基于倾向性评分匹配的机器人和腹腔镜直肠癌根治术的对比研究[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2019, 57(6): 447-451.
    [18]
    张冬生, 张川, 黄远健, 等. 基于倾向性评分匹配法的纳米碳示踪淋巴结在腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术中的应用效果分析[J]. 中华解剖与临床杂志, 2021, 26(1): 50-56. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn101202-20200316-00084
    [19]
    张珂诚, 卫勃, 郗洪庆, 等. 基于倾向性评分匹配的机器人和腹腔镜胃癌根治术的近期与远期疗效比较[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2018, 56(1): 47-51.
  • Related Articles

    [1]SHEN Wenwen, LIU Qin, HUANG Kai, JIANG Xiaogan, CHEN Shanghua. Value of plasma the soluble CD14 subtype in early diagnosis of sepsis patients with acute renal injury[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(10): 46-50. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232835
    [2]GAO Jie, NA Dila, FANG Zhimin. Research progress of miRNA in diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of acute myocardial infarction[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(1): 139-142. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212567
    [3]LI Guangquan, ZHONG Peiying. Diagnosis accuracy of acute myocardial infarction in patients with renal injury using high-sensitivity troponin T[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(11): 85-88. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20211396
    [4]YIN Jianhua, ZHU Jianwei, GU Lichao, ZHONG Yafei, YANG Yao, JIANG Nan, YANG Lijun. Clinical value of early diagnosis in elderly patients with pulmonary embolism[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(17): 103-106. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201917029
    [5]WANG Chunyuan, CAO Tao, QIN Jian. Value of early detection of cardiac troponin I and lactate in evaluating prognosis of emergency elderly patients with severe sepsis and septic shock[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (9): 61-63,68. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201709016
    [6]HONG Shuxin. Effect of early rehabilitation nursing intervention on cardiac function and prognosis of 65 elderly patients with myocardial infarction complicated with arrhythmia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (6): 14-17. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201706005
    [7]LIU Hong, LIU Peizheng. Value of serum procalcitonin in the early diagnosis of children with severe pneumonia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (7): 105-108. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201607031
    [8]JIAN Wen, ZHAO Ying. Study on the effect of knowledge of prevention and treatment of gastric cancer in early diagnosis of gastric cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (22): 31-33. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201522011
    [9]LI Jiajin, GUO Cuiyan, NA Jun, FU Qiang, LIU Li, MENG Qingkun. Value of cystatin C in early diagnosis of nephropathy induced by contrast agent[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (1): 20-22. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201501006
    [10]TANG Chunping, LIU Yanrong, SHEN Qin, YUAN Liang, GUI Ming. Application value of heart-type fattyacid-binding protein in early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (21): 8-11. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201321003
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 黄芳,张纯,陈宝莹,卢肖霞,梁曼谊,罗允内. 穴位贴敷治疗咳嗽变异性哮喘的临床研究. 中国医药科学. 2022(04): 71-73 .
    2. 严瑾,王继鹏. 肺泡气一氧化氮对咳嗽变异性哮喘ICS+LABA治疗反应的意义. 中华肺部疾病杂志(电子版). 2022(05): 673-675 .
    3. 钱星佳,吕红. 从“风”论治咳嗽变异性哮喘的研究概况. 中医临床研究. 2022(21): 48-51 .
    4. 肖超扬. 一氧化氮测定仪诊断小儿咳嗽变异性哮喘的价值体会. 中国医疗器械信息. 2020(20): 68-69 .
    5. 车玲艳,刘建红,樊延平. 苏黄止咳胶囊联合沙美特罗替卡松对咳嗽变异性哮喘患者疗效及对肺功能指标的影响. 山西医药杂志. 2020(23): 3303-3305 .

    Other cited types(4)

Catalog

    Article views (160) PDF downloads (8) Cited by(9)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return