FU Chenyang, ZHOU Ping, ZHANG Pin, HUI Li. Correlations of vaginal microecology with human papilloma virus and cervical lesion[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(16): 37-42. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221628
Citation: FU Chenyang, ZHOU Ping, ZHANG Pin, HUI Li. Correlations of vaginal microecology with human papilloma virus and cervical lesion[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(16): 37-42. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221628

Correlations of vaginal microecology with human papilloma virus and cervical lesion

More Information
  • Received Date: May 22, 2022
  • Revised Date: December 01, 2022
  • Available Online: September 05, 2023
  • Objective 

    To evaluate the associations of vaginal microecology with human papilloma virus (HPV) infection and cervical lesions.

    Methods 

    A total of 772 patients with abnormal preliminary screening results of thin layer liquid based cytology (TCT) were selected, were graded according to the degree of lesions, and the infection of high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) was analyzed. A total of 156 patients without intraepithelial pathological cells and malignant cells (NILM) and negative HPV typing were selected in the initial TCT screening during the same period. All patients were divided into TCT abnormal HPV-positive patients, TCT abnormal HPV-negative patients and TCT normal HPV-negative patients. All patients underwent vaginal microecological examination. Associations of vaginal microecology with HR-HPV and cervical lesion were evaluated.

    Results 

    Among 772 patients with abnormal TCT results, the HPV infection rate was 48.06%. Among them, multiple types of infection accounted for 22.37% of HPV infections. The higher infection rate of the subtypes were HPV52, HPV16 and HPV58. The HPV infection rate in the 772 patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL) was higher than that in the patients with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (LSIL), atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and atypical glandular epithelial cells (AGC), and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In the vaginal microecological study, the positive rates of sialic ananase, leukocyte esterase and bacterial vaginosis (BV) in TCT abnormal HPV-positive patients were compared with those in TCT abnormal HPV-negative patients, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The level of hydrogen peroxide, sialic anhydrolase, leucocytoesterase, β-glucuronidase, coagulase positive rate, BV, aerobic vaginitis (AV), vaginal mixed infection, proportion of vaginal microecological disorders, cleanliness (Ⅲ to Ⅳ) and lactobacillus positive rate in HPV-positive patients with abnormal TCT were compared with those in normal HPV-negative patients, the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Hydrogen peroxide, sialic anhydrase, leocytoesterase positive, BV, co-infection, vaginal dysbiosis, cleanliness (Ⅲ to Ⅳ) were risk factors for HR-HPV positive and/or cervical cytology abnormalities (OR>1, P < 0.05), and lactobacillus positive was a protective factor for HR-HPV positive and/or cervical cytological abnormalities (OR < 1, P < 0.05).

    Conclusion 

    Vaginal microecology is related to HR-HPV infection and cervical lesions, and the imbalance of vaginal microecology is more likely to lead to HR-HPV infection and promote the occurrence and development of cervical lesions.

  • [1]
    VRIEND H J, BOGAARDS J A, VAN BERGEN J E, et al. Incidence and persistence of carcinogenic genital human papillomavirus infections in young women with or without Chlamydia trachomatis co-infection[J]. Cancer Med, 2015, 4(10): 1589-1598. doi: 10.1002/cam4.496
    [2]
    YOUNG V B. The role of the microbiome in human health and disease: an introduction for clinicians[J]. BMJ, 2017, 356: j831.
    [3]
    MENDLING W. Vaginal microbiota[J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2016, 902: 83-93.
    [4]
    AUDIRAC-CHALIFOUR A, TORRES-POVEDA K, BAHENA-ROMÁN M, et al. Cervical microbiome and cytokine profile at various stages of cervical cancer: a pilot study[J]. PLoS One, 2016, 11(4): e0153274. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0153274
    [5]
    DEPUYDT C E, JONCKHEERE J, BERTH M, et al. Serial type-specific human papillomavirus (HPV) load measurement allows differentiation between regressing cervical lesions and serial virion productive transient infections[J]. Cancer Med, 2015, 4(8): 1294-1302. doi: 10.1002/cam4.473
    [6]
    HOPPE-SEYLER K, BOSSLER F, BRAUN J A, et al. The HPV E6/E7 oncogenes: key factors for viral carcinogenesis and therapeutic targets[J]. Trends Microbiol, 2018, 26(2): 158-168. doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.07.007
    [7]
    LI S Y, HONG X L, WEI Z T, et al. Ubiquitination of the HPV oncoprotein E6 is critical for E6/E6AP-mediated p53 degradation[J]. Front Microbiol, 2019, 10: 2483. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02483
    [8]
    LI Y W, LIU X L, HAN C X, et al. Prevalence and genotype distribution of high-risk human papillomavirus in 34 420 cases in Yangzhou city, Jiangsu Province, China[J]. J Med Virol, 2021, 93(8): 5095-5102. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27012
    [9]
    ZHU X Y, WANG Y X, LV Z, et al. Prevalence and genotype distribution of high-risk HPV infection among women in Beijing, China[J]. J Med Virol, 2021, 93(8): 5103-5109. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27013
    [10]
    范洁琳. HPV感染与宫颈病变关系及相关危险因素研究[D]. 长沙: 中南大学, 2014.
    [11]
    王秀芳, 赵辉. 人乳头瘤病毒感染和阴道微生态状况对宫颈鳞状上皮内病变的影响[J]. 中华医院感染学杂志, 2021, 31(2): 268-271. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHYY202102025.htm
    [12]
    LIANG Y J, CHEN M J, QIN L, et al. A meta-analysis of the relationship between vaginal microecology, human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia[J]. Infect Agent Cancer, 2019, 14: 29. doi: 10.1186/s13027-019-0243-8
    [13]
    SNIJDERS P J, VAN DEN BRULE A J, MEIJER C J. The clinical relevance of human papillomavirus testing: relationship between analytical and clinical sensitivity[J]. J Pathol, 2003, 201(1): 1-6. doi: 10.1002/path.1433
    [14]
    黄斐, 赵文龙, 楼颖素, 等. 高危型人乳头瘤病毒感染与阴道微生态及宫颈局部细胞免疫的相关性[J]. 中国微生态学杂志, 2022, 34(4): 463-466. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGWS202204017.htm
    [15]
    MACKLAIM J M, FERNANDES A D, DI BELLA J M, et al. Comparative meta-RNA-seq of the vaginal microbiota and differential expression by Lactobacillus iners in health and dysbiosis[J]. Microbiome, 2013, 1(1): 12. doi: 10.1186/2049-2618-1-12
    [16]
    MITRA A, MACINTYRE D A, MARCHESI J R, et al. The vaginal microbiota, human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: what do we know and where are we going next[J]. Microbiome, 2016, 4(1): 58. doi: 10.1186/s40168-016-0203-0
    [17]
    陈荣, 陈花, 汤莉. 阴道分泌物功能酶检测联合常规镜检在阴道微生态改变中的应用分析[J]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志, 2020, 7(22): 130-130, 140. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FKDZ202022090.htm
    [18]
    KOVACHEV S M. Cervical cancer and vaginal microbiota changes[J]. Arch Microbiol, 2020, 202(2): 323-327. doi: 10.1007/s00203-019-01747-4
    [19]
    DOLS J A, REID G, KORT R, et al. PCR-based identification of eight Lactobacillus species and 18 hr-HPV genotypes in fixed cervical samples of South African women at risk of HIV and BV[J]. Diagn Cytopathol, 2012, 40(6): 472-477. doi: 10.1002/dc.21786
    [20]
    O'HANLON D E, MOENCH T R, CONE R A. In vaginal fluid, bacteria associated with bacterial vaginosis can be suppressed with lactic acid but not hydrogen peroxide[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2011, 11: 200. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-11-200
    [21]
    HARWICH M D Jr, SERRANO M G, FETTWEIS J M, et al. Genomic sequence analysis and characterization of Sneathia amnii sp. nov[J]. BMC Genomics, 2012, 13(Suppl 8): S4.
    [22]
    NAWROT R, KAMIENIARZ K, MALINOWSKA M, et al. The prevalence of leptotrichia amnionii in cervical swabs of HPV positive and negative women[J]. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol, 2010, 31(4): 425-428.
    [23]
    张鹏玲. 宫颈上皮内瘤变和宫颈癌患者阴道微环境因子与阴道菌群的相关性研究[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2021, 34(20): 3617-3619. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXLL202120057.htm
    [24]
    CHEN Y L, QIU X D, WANG W J, et al. Human papillomavirus infection and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia progression are associated with increased vaginal microbiome diversity in a Chinese cohort[J]. BMC Infect Dis, 2020, 20(1): 629.
    [25]
    ŁANIEWSKI P, CUI H Y, ROE D J, et al. Features of the cervicovaginal microenvironment drive cancer biomarker signatures in patients across cervical carcinogenesis[J]. Sci Rep, 2019, 9(1): 7333.
  • Related Articles

    [1]XU Mingkui, CHEN Meixiong, XU Riming, LIN Yewu, LUO Yuantai, CHEN Yingwei, ZHOU Li. Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion by lower Quadrant channel through the muscle gap approach in treatment of lumbar degenerative disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(11): 94-99. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214699
    [2]TAN Fang, WANG Jian, ZHANG Feng, HAN Shuai, SONG Xin, LI Kai. Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive surgery transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in treatment of upper lumbar disc herniation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(12): 42-45. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210644
    [3]FEI Yanqiang, LI Xiaolong, JIANG Wenchao, GAO Xin. Middle and long-term clinical efficacy of modified transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(16): 74-76,81. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202016021
    [4]YAO Shixiang. Percutaneous one-way solid pedicle screw fixationversus pedicle screw fixation in treating patients with thoracolumbar fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(9): 27-30. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201909008
    [5]WANG Yuqiang, JIN Haichao, LI Zhonghai, LI He, SU Xuetao. Curative effect of MI-TLIF under expansion channel combined with pedicle screw fixation on treatment of patients with lumbar degenerative scoliosis complicated with spinal stenosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (7): 67-70. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201707018
    [6]ZHAO Yihong, GAO Junmao, HE Heliang. Long-term efficacy of small target region intensity-modulated radiotherapy and chemotherapy in treatment of patients with nasopharyngeal cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (21): 73-76. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201521020
    [7]LI Jun, WANG Jieyan. Efficacy observation of pedicle screw fixation and posterior interbody fusion in the treatment of 80 patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (16): 93-95. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201416027
    [8]WANG Xiaolin. Comparison of long-term effects between Cage combined with pedicle screw fixation and bone grafting combined with pedicle screw fixation in treatment of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (15): 38-41. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201415012
    [9]LI Yi. Clinical study of spinal interbody fusion with pedicle screw rod system fixation and laminectomy in treating elderly degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (7): 69-71,78. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201307022
    [10]ZUO Hua, HUANG Yong-hui, DING Liang. Observation of clinical effect of unilateral pedicle screw fixation with intervertebral morselized bone body fusion after decompression in treating degenerative lumbar instability[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2011, (21): 26-28. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2353.2011.21.008
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(29)

    1. 张婷,张苗苗. 分级分区护理管理模式对急性心肌梗死患者心功能及预后的改善作用. 临床医学研究与实践. 2022(16): 169-171 .
    2. 朱勇. 医疗失效模式与效应分析法优化急救流程在急性心肌梗死行急诊PCI患者中的应用效果. 中国民康医学. 2021(17): 148-150 .
    3. 张霞,吕艳梅,王丽绒,韩月. 胸痛中心再灌注救治流程护理对急性心肌梗死患者救治成功率的影响. 临床医药文献电子杂志. 2020(04): 113-114 .
    4. 朱慧瑜. 胸痛中心急救护理路径对STEMI患者诊治效果的影响. 心血管病防治知识(学术版). 2020(01): 75-77 .
    5. 盛亚萍,邹姣. 胸痛中心管理模式下的急救护理路径对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者救治效率及效果的影响. 国际护理学杂志. 2020(05): 892-894 .
    6. 王召义,马懿,许官学. 区域协同救治体系的建立及其推动基层胸痛中心建设的意义. 海南医学. 2020(09): 1179-1182 .
    7. 谢索. 胸痛中心再灌注救治流程护理在急性心肌梗死患者中的护理效果. 心血管病防治知识(学术版). 2020(10): 89-91 .
    8. 邓金梅,吴燕群,陈银花. 急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者应用胸痛中心(CPC)再灌注救治流程护理的价值分析. 中外医疗. 2020(14): 161-163 .
    9. 刘海龙. 胸痛中心对心肌梗死急诊介入时间的临床影响研究. 当代医学. 2020(33): 68-70 .
    10. 李利群,林海云,黄风莲,李凤云. 基层胸痛中心建设对急性心肌梗死救治的意义. 中国城乡企业卫生. 2019(02): 4-6 .
    11. 杨菁,金明,高斌,仲淑燕. 实施胸痛中心护理机制对心血管疾病患者抢救效率的影响. 广西医学. 2019(04): 533-535 .
    12. 周强. 胸痛中心再灌注救治流程护理对急性心肌梗死患者救治成功率的影响. 家庭生活指南. 2019(02): 284 .
    13. 许丽丽,王秀精,邱敏玲. 急诊全程综合护理干预对急性心肌梗死患者救治效果影响分析. 中外医学研究. 2019(18): 105-107 .
    14. 黎德庆,刘子永. 胸痛中心建立对区域内急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者救治效果的影响. 中国当代医药. 2019(16): 31-34 .
    15. 谢丽芬,张伟泰,丘夏玲. 胸痛中心再灌注救治流程护理在急性心肌梗死患者中的应用效果. 中国当代医药. 2019(17): 220-222 .
    16. 刘毅蓉. 胸痛中心再灌注救治流程护理对急性心肌梗死患者救治成功率的影响. 世界最新医学信息文摘. 2019(67): 320-321 .
    17. 郝清云. 再灌注救治流程护理对提升急性心肌梗死患者救治成功率的效果分析. 中国医药指南. 2019(24): 208-209 .
    18. 黄金链. 急性胸痛患者有效的抢救护理方法及效果探讨. 医学食疗与健康. 2019(11): 136+139 .
    19. 李燕珍,胡良巧. 优化急诊护理流程对急诊胸痛患者抢救的效果. 卫生职业教育. 2019(23): 155-156 .
    20. 翟旭莉. 胸痛中心再灌注救治流程护理对急性心肌梗死患者救治成功率的影响分析. 世界最新医学信息文摘. 2019(A0): 224-225 .
    21. 向阳. 胸痛中心对急性心肌梗死患者抢救效果的影响研究. 中国社区医师. 2019(33): 75+77 .
    22. 苏秀娜,朱时法. 胸痛中心急性心肌梗死患者行再灌注救治流程护理的心得体会. 心血管病防治知识(学术版). 2019(21): 48-50 .
    23. 王春梅,徐琴,彭利芳,黄蔚萍. 胸痛中心建设中优化护理流程的实践与探索. 当代护士(上旬刊). 2018(06): 179-181 .
    24. 钟凤琼,祖木拉提·胡甫尔. 优化急救护理流程对急性心肌梗死患者救治的影响. 临床医药文献电子杂志. 2018(77): 108+121 .
    25. 刘冬兰. 胸痛中心再灌注救治流程在ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者中的影响. 实用临床护理学电子杂志. 2018(40): 109-110 .
    26. 韩志领,王丽娟,王建慧. 成立胸痛中心对救治急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的影响. 实用中西医结合临床. 2018(09): 21-23 .
    27. 李小芬,丁玲,刘祺. 全程介入护理在急性心肌梗死经桡动脉行急诊经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者的应用效果. 中西医结合心血管病电子杂志. 2018(29): 89-91 .
    28. 吕月平,关丽荣. 基层胸痛中心优化护理急救流程的建立及其在AMI患者救治中的应用. 系统医学. 2018(20): 196-198 .
    29. 赵成红. 优化护理在心肌梗死PCI患者中的临床应用观察及疗效分析. 世界最新医学信息文摘. 2018(93): 4-5 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article views (178) PDF downloads (32) Cited by(35)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return