LUO Heng, MEI Yuejing, LIU Xilong, ZHANG Liying, LU Dan. Application of cesarean section with preserved fetal membrane sac in premature delivery of twin-pregnant women[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(23): 60-64. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20222253
Citation: LUO Heng, MEI Yuejing, LIU Xilong, ZHANG Liying, LU Dan. Application of cesarean section with preserved fetal membrane sac in premature delivery of twin-pregnant women[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(23): 60-64. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20222253

Application of cesarean section with preserved fetal membrane sac in premature delivery of twin-pregnant women

More Information
  • Received Date: July 21, 2022
  • Available Online: December 22, 2022
  • Objective 

    To explore application value of cesarean section with preserved fetal membrane sac in premature delivery of twin-pregnant women.

    Methods 

    The clinical data of 20 twin-pregnant women who performed cesarean section with preserved fetal membrane sac due to premature delivery in North Jiangsu People's Hospital from 2019 to 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Another 30 twin-pregnant women who performed conventional lower uterine section for delivery in twin-pregnant women in the same period were selected as control group. The differences of operation time, amniotic fluid volume, intraoperative blood loss, neonatal Apgar score, neonatal birth weight, neonatal asphyxia and other aspects were analyzed. The differences of surgical indicators and pregnancy outcomes between cesarean section with preserved fetal membrane sac and conventional new lower uterine were compared.

    Results 

    The average operation time of the observation group was (37.63±10.85) min, which was significantly shorter than (50.00±10.50) min in the control group(P < 0.05). The intraoperative blood loss in the observation group was (384.21±229.16) mL, which was more than (373.33±163.86) mL in the control group, but no significant difference was observed (P>0.05). The mean creatine kinase level in neonates with completely preserved fetal sac was (247.50±85.19) U/dL, which was lower than (311.35±138.03) U/dL in the control group and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss and neonatal asphyxia between cesarean section with preserved fetal membrane sac and conventional new lower uterine section (P>0.05).

    Conclusion 

    Cesarean section with preserved fetal membrane sac can shorten operation time, improve the outcome of premature twin pregnancy, and may have a positive effect in reducing myocardial injury in premature infants.

  • [1]
    马霞. 综合护理干预对早产儿生长发育的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2014, 18(24): 219-220. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201424104
    [2]
    ALEXANDER J M, LEVENO K J, HAUTH J, et al. Fetal injury associated with cesarean delivery[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2006, 108(4): 885-890. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000237116.72011.f3
    [3]
    李光忠, 刘细萍, 罗卫娟, 等. 分娩过程中脐带挤压对早产儿脑损伤的影响[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(15): 115-118. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.202015033
    [4]
    HEGGARTY H, SHENOUDA D, GRISDALE M. Born in a caul. remarkable survival[J]. Am J Dis Child, 1975, 129(8): 955. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1975.02120450061013
    [5]
    PEARSON J F. En Caule cesarean section for delivery of the very low birth weight baby. A Color Atlas of Childbirth and Obstetric Techniques[M]. London: Wolfe Publishing Ltd., 1990: 137-141.
    [6]
    TAKAGI K, MURAOKA M. Cesarean delivery "en caul"in Japan: results of a national survey of maternal and perinatal centers in Japan[J]. Hypertens Res Pregnancy, 2019, 7 (2): 56-61. doi: 10.14390/jsshp.HRP2019-006
    [7]
    MALIK R, SARFRAZ A, FAROQUI R, et al. Extremely preterm (23 weeks) vaginal cephalic delivery en caul and subsequent postpartum intraventricular hemorrhage and respiratory distress: a teaching case[J]. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 2018: 5690125.
    [8]
    MCGURGAN P, MAOURIS P, HART R, et al. En caul delivery of the fetus to facilitate cell salvage[J]. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol, 2004, 44(6): 585. doi: 10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00316.x
    [9]
    臧月珍, 杨阳阳, 吕媛, 等. 不同胎龄新生儿呼吸窘迫综合征早产儿血细胞分析指标及临床特点[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(1): 69-73. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20200938
    [10]
    金镇, 尚涛, 王德智, 张淑兰. 早产时应用保留胎膜囊剖宫产术式的临床研究[J]. 中国优生与遗传杂志, 2005, 13(1): 79-80, 95. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-9534.2005.01.039
    [11]
    SHIBATA T, NAKAGO S, NISHIKAWA S, et al. A disadvantage of cesarean section en caul: Umbilical velamentous insertion, a risk factor and proposed mechanism of neonatal Anemia[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2020, 46(1): 173-175. doi: 10.1111/jog.14147
    [12]
    ABOUZEID H, THORNTON J G. Pre-term delivery by Caesarean section 'en caul': a case series[J]. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 1999, 84(1): 51-53. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(98)00245-0
    [13]
    张继红, 罗序清, 刘海梅, 等. 双胎妊娠一胎保留胎膜囊的剖宫产术对产后出血的影响[J]. 实用临床医学, 2020, 21(8): 37-39. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCSY202008014.htm
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(15)

    1. 向保秀, 秦艳萍. 人性化护理对病毒性脑膜炎患儿缓解时间的影响分析. 心理月刊. 2020(08): 97 .
    2. 王乐, 勾双艳. 人性化护理对手指断指再植患者术后康复效果的影响. 中国民康医学. 2020(08): 175-176 .
    3. 郝宝生, 黄丽凤, 钱胜华. 重症脑炎患儿并发急性呼吸衰竭的影响因素分析. 中国妇幼保健. 2020(15): 2829-2831 .
    4. 周春连. ICU综合护理在小儿急性呼吸衰竭护理中的应用. 中国医药科学. 2019(01): 104-106 .
    5. 阙利平, 程丽丽. 人性化护理干预对阑尾炎手术患儿治疗效果及家属满意度的影响. 实用临床护理学电子杂志. 2019(18): 95-96 .
    6. 林碧惠, 简咏芬, 蔡艳, 范徐威, 杨燕华, 王翠敏. 脑脊液miRNA-22水平对儿童细菌性脑膜炎的早期诊断及疗效分析. 中华脑科疾病与康复杂志(电子版). 2019(03): 132-136 .
    7. 张国珺. 人性化护理干预对无创呼吸机治疗老年呼吸衰竭患者临床疗效及肺功能影响分析. 医学理论与实践. 2019(18): 2998-2999 .
    8. 尤舒甜, 韩利花. 呼吸衰竭护理应用人性化优质护理服务的效果分析. 世界最新医学信息文摘. 2019(75): 333-334 .
    9. 黄玲. 人性化护理对呼吸衰竭患者的依从性及并发症的影响. 西藏医药. 2019(06): 111-112 .
    10. 程蕊. 探讨小儿病毒性脑膜炎在综合性干预下的临床疗效. 齐齐哈尔医学院学报. 2019(22): 2899-2900 .
    11. 吕莹. 人性化护理模式在老年呼吸衰竭患者中的应用. 中国医药指南. 2019(33): 284-285 .
    12. 陶丽霞. 综合性干预对小儿病毒性脑炎的临床效果分析. 临床医药文献电子杂志. 2018(77): 136+138 .
    13. 杨来萍. 人性化护理模式在老年呼吸衰竭病人护理中的应用. 实用临床护理学电子杂志. 2018(39): 109 .
    14. 王晓蕾, 王镇. 人性化服务对儿童医院外科门诊护理中家属满意度的影响分析. 心理月刊. 2018(07): 113-114 .
    15. 郁磊. 人性化护理对重症病毒性脑膜炎合并呼吸衰竭患儿症状缓解时间的影响分析. 中外女性健康研究. 2018(21): 150+152 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views PDF downloads Cited by(16)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return