Advance Search
CHENG Xuejiao, DONG Guannan, WANG Kai, ZHANG Yucui, ZHAO Haijing, LI Yao, ZHANG Xiaowei. Relationships of nutritional status and length of stay with phase angle in patients with severe craniocerebral injury[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(2): 105-108. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20233052
Citation: CHENG Xuejiao, DONG Guannan, WANG Kai, ZHANG Yucui, ZHAO Haijing, LI Yao, ZHANG Xiaowei. Relationships of nutritional status and length of stay with phase angle in patients with severe craniocerebral injury[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(2): 105-108. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20233052
shu

Relationships of nutritional status and length of stay with phase angle in patients with severe craniocerebral injury

  • 1.

    Department of Nutrition, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000

  • 2.

    Department of Neurosurgery, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000

  • 3.

    Ethics Management Office, Hebei General Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, 050000

More Information
  • Received Date: September 24, 2023
  • Revised Date: November 28, 2023
  • Available Online: January 25, 2024
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  • Objective 

    To investigate the relationships of nutritional status and length of stay (LOS) with phase angle (PA) in patients with severe craniocerebral injury.

    Methods 

    A total of 100 patients [Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score ≤8 points] admitted outside the department of neurology were selected as study objects. Body composition analysis and blood samples were used to determine the intracellular and extracellular water content, skeletal muscle, PA, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and LOS. Patients were divided into low PA group (n=42) and normal PA group (n=58) based on PA values. Body composition related indexes, PNI and LOS were compared between the two groups. The correlation between PA and each index was analyzed. The influencing factors of malnutrition were analyzed. The influencing factors of malnutrition were analyzed.

    Results 

    Intracellular water, total body water, body cell content and PNI in the low PA group were significantly lower, and LOS was significantly longer than that in the normal PA group (P < 0.05). PA was positively correlated with intracellular water, extracellular water, total body water, skeletal muscle, body cell content, bone mineral content, basal metabolic rate and PNI (P < 0.05), while PA was negatively correlated with LOS (P < 0.05). PA (OR=5.441, P=0.001, 95%CI, 2.011 to 14.719) and LOS (OR=8.373, P < 0.001, 95%CI, 3.079 to 22.765) were the influential factors in the occurrence of malnutrition.

    Conclusion 

    PA is significantly correlated with nutritional status and LOS in patients with severe craniocerebral injury.

    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (12)
  • [1]
    DU T J, JING X Y, SONG S R, et al. Therapeutic effect of enteral nutrition supplemented with probiotics in the treatment of severe craniocerebral injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. World Neurosurg, 2020, 139: e553-e571. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.083
    [2]
    谭敏, 朱京慈, 王惠君, 等. 早期肠内营养联合益生菌对重型颅脑损伤患者营养状况的影响[J]. 中华创伤杂志, 2011, 27(4): 316-319.
    [3]
    TAN M, ZHU J C, YIN H H. Enteral nutrition in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: reasons for intolerance and medical management[J]. Br J Neurosurg, 2011, 25(1): 2-8. doi: 10.3109/02688697.2010.522745
    [4]
    MANGAT H S. Severe traumatic brain injury[J]. Continuum, 2012, 18(3): 532-546.
    [5]
    周红, 邓明珍, 李亚玲, 等. 初诊食管癌患者生物电阻抗相位角与营养状况的关系研究[J]. 肿瘤预防与治疗, 2020, 33(9): 775-780.
    [6]
    KYLE U G, GENTON L, PICHARD C. Low phase angle determined by bioelectrical impedance analysis is associated with malnutrition and nutritional risk at hospital admission[J]. Clin Nutr, 2013, 32(2): 294-299. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.08.001
    [7]
    NORMAN K, STOBÄUS N, PIRLICH M, et al. Bioelectrical phase angle and impedance vector analysis: clinical relevance and applicability of impedance parameters[J]. Clin Nutr, 2012, 31(6): 854-861. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2012.05.008
    [8]
    崔玉环, 张婧文, 徐雅丽, 等. 预后营养指数与微型营养评估表对老年急性脑梗死患者营养状况的评估效果比较[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(19): 30-35. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20213191
    [9]
    BORDA F, MIRANDA C, BORDA A, et al. Relation between preoperative prognostic Onodera's Index and postsurgery complications in the R0 gastric carcinoma resection[J]. An Sist Sanit Navar, 2017, 40(1): 67-75. doi: 10.23938/ASSN.0007
    [10]
    YASUI-YAMADA S, OIWA Y, SAITO Y, et al. Impact of phase angle on postoperative prognosis in patients with gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary-pancreatic cancer[J]. Nutrition, 2020, 79/80: 110891. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2020.110891
    [11]
    章露文, 范锐心, 常颖, 等. 微生态制剂肠内营养对43例重型颅脑损伤患者的疗效[J]. 山东大学学报: 医学版, 2021, 59(6): 111-116.
    [12]
    宁华英, 赵崇法, 齐玉梅, 等. 相位角预测手术病人营养风险及住院时间[J]. 肠外与肠内营养, 2017, 24(5): 296-300.
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]WAN Jiangwei, CHENG Dongru, WANG Tao, GAO Ping. Value of serum lactate dehydrogenase, β2 microglobulin and ferritin combined with modified WHO-based Prognostic Scoring System in predicting poor prognosis of myelodysplastic syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(5): 79-84. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20233107
    [2]XIE Fang, JIANG Xinting, ZHANG Rui, HUA Yang, LIANG Li. Consistency and accuracy of four prognostic scoring systems in predicting prognosis of patients with spinal metastasis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(21): 52-58. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232326
    [3]LIU Lijing, MA Hongxin, DU Rui, DI Xiaoling, GU Hua. Effect of a new lung ultrasound scoring method in evaluation of disease condition of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and its application in treatment[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(21): 111-114. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221820
    [4]SONG Linke, JIANG Jue, WANG Juan, ZHOU Qi. Value of artificial intelligence assisted scoring system combined with ultrasound elastography in the diagnosis of benign and malignant thyroid nodules[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(4): 7-10. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20201478
    [5]SONG Xiaoling, LIU Xianying, LONG Xiaoqiu. Effect of modified early MEWS score system on triage efficacy for emergency patients with chest pain[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (22): 19-21. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201722007
    [6]CAI Xinyu, JIANG Lin, CAO Jing. Value of modified early warning scoring system for emergency patients in department of internal medicine[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (4): 26-28. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201704009
    [7]XIONG Jie, LAI Xin, YANG Rong. Comparative study on ICNSS, APACHE Ⅱ and SAPS Ⅱ scoring system in evaluation of treatment status of emergency patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (22): 21-23. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201622007
    [8]HAN Shanqin, ZHOU Yuping, DING Yuqin. Application of APACHE Ⅱ scoring system in evaluation of nursing risk in patients with respiratory failure complicated with AECOPD[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (22): 18-20. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201622006
    [9]WANG Kai, JIN Nuyun, WEI Shuangqin, LI Yuqin. Application of Rockall risk scoring system in patients with acute non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (3): 15-18. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201403005
    [10]HUANG Kegang. Relationships between acute physiology and chronic health evaluation system Ⅲ, oxygenation index and prognosis of senile severe pneumonia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (5): 24-25,32. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201305006

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(26)

    1. 赖惠菲，赖亮，李小斌，许春华. 输尿管软镜碎石术治疗直径小于2cm肾结石后应用结石通胶囊联合盐酸坦索罗辛临床观察. 实用中医药杂志. 2024(01): 85-87 .
    2. 曹滨，何永欢，丁勇. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术与输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗肾结石的效果观察. 大医生. 2024(05): 56-58 .
    3. 谢奕彪，崔小健. 输尿管软镜碎石取石术治疗直径≤2 cm的肾结石的疗效及对肾功能和炎症相关指标的影响. 中国内镜杂志. 2024(05): 75-81 .
    4. 聂武刚. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术对上尿路结石患者结石清除效果及应激指标的影响. 医学信息. 2024(12): 115-118 .
    5. 张恒志. 经皮肾镜碎石取石术对肾结石患者肾功能指标、并发症发生率及生活质量的影响. 中国医学创新. 2024(17): 33-37 .
    6. 方晖东，刘俊峰，潘佐，乔璐，刘智超. 输尿管软镜碎石术在2 cm左右肾结石中的应用价值. 泌尿外科杂志(电子版). 2024(03): 17-20 .
    7. 刘国政. 不同碎石术对上尿路结石患者结石逃逸和肾功能的影响. 中国激光医学杂志. 2024(05): 263-268 .
    8. 黎德林，黄恒海，陈值权，龙勇新，林圣皓. 输尿管软镜联合可视穿刺F4.8超微通道经皮肾镜治疗肾多发性结石的临床研究. 中国医药科学. 2023(01): 187-191 .
    9. 王培龙，李笑然，何藄琪，马腾，符小宝，包军胜，杨宁强. 单通道经皮肾镜取石术联合输尿管软镜与输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术治疗复杂性肾结石的效果比较. 实用临床医药杂志. 2023(02): 101-104+112 . 本站查看
    10. 霍建武，张金刚. 输尿管软镜钬激光碎石术对直径2～3 cm肾结石患者肾功能的影响研究. 中国医药科学. 2023(12): 145-148 .
    11. 郝强，焦宗久，牛忠涛，石丽佳，张淑敬. mPCNL与RIRS对直径>2cm肾结石患者肾功能及氧化应激指标的影响. 临床误诊误治. 2023(06): 103-107 .
    12. 陈王超. 输尿管导管与斑马导丝对URL中输尿管损伤的预防效果. 淮海医药. 2023(04): 383-386 .
    13. 张小军，张立国，高海洋，刘健，曹凤宏，张金存，王勇，高伟兴. 输尿管软镜碎石术联合叶金排石胶囊治疗直径小于2 cm肾结石临床疗效分析. 中华中医药学刊. 2022(01): 212-215 .
    14. 张家杰，徐方明，潘高宇，葛波，肖宁，韦开禄. 硕通镜钬激光碎石术与微通道经皮肾镜碎石术治疗输尿管上段结石(<2cm)疗效及应激反应指标变化的比较. 中国性科学. 2022(01): 23-26 .
    15. 谢强. 输尿管镜下钬激光与气压弹道碎石术治疗输尿管对比研究. 甘肃医药. 2022(02): 137-138+143 .
    16. 冯德胜，张亚旗，周东方. 超微经皮肾镜取石术与输尿管软镜碎石取石术治疗男性长径≥2.0 cm肾结石的效果比较. 中国实用医刊. 2022(07): 17-20 .
    17. 林燕娇. 疼痛护理干预对急诊肾结石患者疼痛程度、生理应激反应及睡眠质量的影响分析. 中外医疗. 2022(05): 154-157+162 .
    18. 刘旭东，杜勇，李志远，何正宇. 复杂肾结石患者行经皮肾镜、输尿管软镜单一及联合治疗效果、炎症指标及安全性对比研究. 实用医院临床杂志. 2022(04): 102-105 .
    19. 卓兴宇，张云，陈从其. 经尿道输尿管软镜碎石术治疗肾结石的临床研究. 实用中西医结合临床. 2022(15): 63-65+81 .
    20. 潘中义，张世清，熊玉龙. 输尿管支架在输尿管软镜治疗2～3cm肾结石的疗效及对术后排石、术后排尿症状评分的影响分析. 世界复合医学. 2022(09): 119-123 .
    21. 王刚，章钟，张国华，徐启鹏，汪锡兴，江金龙，潘周辉. F16微通道与标准通道经皮肾镜取石术临床疗效比较. 中国临床医生杂志. 2021(04): 469-471 .
    22. 王勤军. 经皮肾镜联合输尿管软镜治疗复杂性肾结石效果观察. 实用中西医结合临床. 2021(07): 126-128 .
    23. 霍自豪. 电子输尿管软镜下钬激光碎石对肾结石患者清石率、机体应激反应及Cys-C、KIM-1水平的影响. 临床医学研究与实践. 2021(28): 91-93 .
    24. 朱晨迪，郑鹏毅，周真真. 输尿管硬镜负压组合式吸引鞘在肾结石患者术中的应用效果与安全性观察. 云南医药. 2021(06): 533-535+529 .
    25. 陈然，潘晓明，田慷. 经输尿管软镜碎石术与经皮肾镜碎石术治疗肾结石的效果分析. 现代医学与健康研究电子杂志. 2021(24): 74-77 .
    26. 高景宇，王磊，罗子靖，徐哲，张晔. 尿液白介素-6和肿瘤坏死因子-α表达水平与输尿管结石钬激光碎石术后输尿管痉挛的相关性研究. 中国医学前沿杂志(电子版). 2020(12): 76-80 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (135) PDF downloads (11) Cited by(26)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    © 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部

    Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807

    苏公网安备 32100302010246号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return