| Citation: |
LI Bo, HU Chuancui, ZHAO Da, LIN Fangting, GAO Yan, LIN Caiyun, WANG Xiaoli. The effect of salpingectomy with preservation of the mesosalpinx on ovarian reserve function[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(4): 34-38, 44. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20233457
|
To investigate the impact of salpingectomy with preservation of fallopian tube mesentery on ovarian reserve function.
A total of 281 patients with tubal disease who were admitted from January 2020 to March 2021 were collected as research objects. According to the different treatment methods, they were divided into traditional bilateral resection group (n=53, conventional bilateral salpingectomy), traditional unilateral resection group (n=56, conventional unilateral salpingectomy), preservation of bilateral resection group (n=60, bilateral salpingectomy with preservation of fallopian tube mesentery), preservation of unilateral resection group (n=54, unilateral salpingectomy with preservation of fallopian tube mesentery), and control group[n=58, patients with in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer (IVF-ET) but no history of salpingectomy]. The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative exhaust time were compared among the groups. Two months after the operation, IVF-ET was performed, and the number of follicles and oocytes, pregnancy rate, and fertilization rate were detected. The levels of anti-mullerian hormone (AMH), follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), estradiol (E2), and luteinizing hormone (LH) in peripheral blood were detected after IVF-ET. Follow-up was conducted until March 2023, and pregnancy success rates were recorded for the five groups.
There were no significant differences in perioperative operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and postoperative exhaust time among traditional bilateral resection group, traditional unilateral resection group, preservation of bilateral resection group, preservation of unilateral resection group (P>0.05). After IVF-ET, there were significant differences in AMH, FSH, E2, and LH levels among the five groups (P < 0.05). The levels of AMH and E2 in a rising sequence were traditional bilateral resection group, traditional unilateral resection group, preservation of bilateral resection group, preservation of unilateral resection group and control group, while the levels of FSH and LH in descending sequencing were traditional bilateral resection group, traditional unilateral resection group, preservation of bilateral resection group, preservation of unilateral resection group and control group. Follow-up was conducted until March 2023, and the pregnancy success rates after IVF-ET were 45.28%, 50.00%, 53.33%, 59.26%, and 58.62% in the traditional bilateral resection group, traditional unilateral resection group, preservation of bilateral resection group, preservation of unilateral resection group, and control group, respectively. There was no significant difference in pregnancy success rate after IVF-ET among the five groups (χ2=3.044, P=0.551).
Compared with traditional salpingectomy, salpingectomy with preservation of fallopian tube mesentery has less impact on ovarian reserve function.
| [1] |
FOUDA U M, ELSHAER H S, YOUSSEF M A, et al. Extended doxycycline treatment versus salpingectomy in the management of patients with hydrosalpinx undergoing IVF-ET[J]. J Ovarian Res, 2020, 13(1): 69. doi: 10.1186/s13048-020-00665-0
|
| [2] |
BOERNER T, LONG ROCHE K. Salpingectomy for the Risk Reduction of Ovarian Cancer: Is It Time for a Salpingectomy-alone Approach[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2021, 28(3): 403-408. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.09.020
|
| [3] |
MILLS K, MARCHAND G, SAINZ K, et al. Salpingectomy vs tubal ligation for sterilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2021, 224(3): 258-265. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.09.011
|
| [4] |
赵蕊, 赵红利, 张莉娟. 腹腔镜下双侧输卵管结扎术、输卵管切除术与近端灼断术对不孕患者卵巢储备功能及术后妊娠率影响[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2022, 30(7): 1608-1611, 1616. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSY202207030.htm
|
| [5] |
CHICHURA A M, YAO M, BRETSCHNEIDER C E, et al. Feasibility and Outcomes of Opportunistic Bilateral Salpingectomy in Patients with Traditional Relative Contraindications to Vaginal Hysterectomy[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2020, 27(6): 1405-1413. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2019.12.002
|
| [6] |
GAY C, PERRIN J, COURBIERE B, et al. Impact of salpingectomy for ectopic pregnancy on the ovarian response during IVF stimulation[J]. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod, 2019, 48(9): 727-730. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.05.009
|
| [7] |
余文珺. 输卵管妊娠行腹腔镜下改良输卵管壶腹部开窗取胚缝合术与输卵管切除术对卵巢储备功能影响[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2021, 29(9): 1877-1880. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSY202109021.htm
|
| [8] |
马玮, 张寒, 郭修权, 等. 抽芯法输卵管切除术治疗异位妊娠对患者卵巢储备功能的影响[J]. 现代医用影像学, 2020, 29(12): 2362-2365. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDYY202012058.htm
|
| [9] |
JIAO X, MENG T, ZHAI Y, et al. Ovarian Reserve Markers in Premature Ovarian Insufficiency: Within Different Clinical Stages and Different Etiologies[J]. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne), 2021, 12(3): 601752.
|
| [10] |
CAI Y, ZHANG Q, YU K, et al. Study of Serum Anti-Mullerian Hormone in the Diagnosis of Ovarian Reserve Function in Patients with Premature Ovarian Insufficiency[J]. Biomed Res Int, 2022, 2022(10): 3878359.
|
| [11] |
刘雪玲, 胡春艳, 刘港, 等. 卵巢早衰发病机制及相关治疗机制的最新研究进展[J]. 江苏大学学报: 医学版, 2021, 31(6): 541-548. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJYZ202106016.htm
|
| [12] |
XIA Q, XIE L, WU Q, et al. Elevated baseline LH/FSH ratio is associated with poor ovulatory response but better clinical pregnancy and live birth in Chinese women with PCOS after ovulation induction[J]. Heliyon, 2023, 9(1): e13024. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13024
|
| [13] |
JIE H, JINXIANG W, YE L, et al. Effects of umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells on expression of CYR61, FSH and AMH in mice with premature ovarian failure[J]. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand), 2022, 67(4): 358-366. doi: 10.14715/cmb/2021.67.5.41
|
| [14] |
QIU X, GAO Y, GUO T. Decomposition of Clinical Significance of FSH, LH, E2, AMH, and AFC Standards in Females at Lofty Elevation Based on HIF1α[J]. Contrast Media Mol Imaging, 2022, 2022(8): 6112659.
|
| [15] |
刘琳, 彭小彧, 张晓梅, 等. 外泌体在多囊卵巢综合征中的研究进展及其检测手段[J]. 生殖医学杂志, 2019, 28(8): 976-979. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SZYX201908025.htm
|
| [16] |
YUAN Z, CAO D, BI X, et al. The effects of hysterectomy with bilateral salpingectomy on ovarian reserve[J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2019, 145(2): 233-238. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.12798
|
| [17] |
严丽慧, 潘晨萍, 裴凤霞. 腹腔镜下抽芯式输卵管切除联合间质部缝扎术的临床应用及对卵巢功能的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(7): 1677-1679. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZFYB202107068.htm
|
| [18] |
魏佳, 卢春梅, 邵勇, 等. 不同输卵管系膜状态子宫内膜异位囊肿患者术后血清抗苗勒管激素水平差异分析[J]. 新乡医学院学报, 2019, 36(6): 566-570. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XXYX201906018.htm
|
| [19] |
GUPTA V, AGARWAL S, CHAUDHARI P, et al. A Study to Evaluate the Effect of Opportunistic Salpingectomy on Ovarian Reserve and Function[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol India, 2023, 73(1): 62-68. doi: 10.1007/s13224-022-01709-9
|
| [20] |
MOHAMED A A, YOSEF A H, JAMES C, et al. Ovarian reserve after salpingectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2017, 96(7): 795-803. doi: 10.1111/aogs.13133
|
© 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部
Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807
Supported by:
Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.
苏公网安备 32100302010246号
DownLoad: