Citation: | ZHANG Longyu, KANG Xiaole, REN Jingpei, JIA Zhiwei. Application effects of endoscopic laminar fenestration versus percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression in the treatment of degenerative lumbar lateral recess stenosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(21): 1-5, 12. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20241994 |
To compare the short-term efficacy and occurrence of complication of endoscopic laminar fenestration (Endo-LOVE) and percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal decompression (PETD) in patients with degenerative lumbar lateral recess stenosis (LSLRS).
A total of 160 patients with LSLRS were enrolled as study objects, and were randomly assigned to control group (treated with PETD) and observation group (treated with Endo-LOVE), with 80 patients in each group. Surgical indicators, occurrence of complications, and therapeutic effects were observed and compared between the two groups. Bone lateral recess angle, soft lateral recess angle, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, pain score, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score were compared before and after surgery.
The observation group had less intraoperative blood loss, and shorter operative and hospital stays than the control group (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence of complications such as lower limb numbness, fever, and postoperative low back pain between the two groups (P>0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative bone lateral recess angle or soft lateral recess angle between the two groups (P>0.05). At 72 hours postoperatively, both angles increased in both groups compared with preoperative values, and the observation group had larger angles than the control group (P < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in preoperative pain score, ODI score, or JOA score between the two groups (P>0.05). At 3 months postoperatively, JOA scores increased and pain scores as well as ODI scores decreased in both groups compared with preoperative values, with the observation group having higher JOA scores and lower pain scores as well as ODI scores than the control group (P < 0.05). The excellent and good rate was 96.25%(77/80) in the observation group, which was higher than 87.50%(70/80) in the control group (P < 0.05).
Compared with the PETD approach, the Endo-LOVE approach for the treatment of LSLRS offers shorter operative time, less intraoperative blood loss, and better short-term efficacy.
[1] |
ASANO L Y J, BERGAMASCHI J P M, DOWLING Á, et al. Transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy; clinical outcomes and complications[J]. Rev Bras Ortop, 2020, 55(1): 48-53. doi: 10.1055/s-0039-1700822
|
[2] |
余可谊. 退行性脊柱疾病微创手术的进展[J]. 中华骨与关节外科杂志, 2021, 14(5): 344-349.
|
[3] |
时福东, 张世民. 经皮脊柱内镜治疗退变性腰椎管狭窄症的现状及进展[J]. 中国骨伤, 2022, 35(4): 400-404.
|
[4] |
常国亮, 赵云昌. 经皮椎板间入路内镜下椎管减压术治疗老年腰椎侧隐窝狭窄症的疗效[J]. 微创医学, 2022, 17(6): 761-763, 807.
|
[5] |
白一冰, 徐岭, 赵文亮, 等. 《退变性腰椎管狭窄症临床诊疗指南》手术治疗简介[J]. 国际骨科学杂志, 2012, 33(3): 213-214.
|
[6] |
程继伟, 王振林, 刘伟, 等. Oswestry功能障碍指数的改良及信度和效度检验[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2017, 27(3): 235-241.
|
[7] |
孙兵, 车晓明. 视觉模拟评分法(VAS)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2012, 28(6): 645-645.
|
[8] |
孙兵, 车晓明. 日本骨科协会评估治疗(JOA评分)[J]. 中华神经外科杂志, 2013, 29(9): 969-969.
|
[9] |
HEO D H, PARK D Y, HONG H J, et al. Indications, contraindications, and complications of biportal endoscopic decompressive surgery for the treatment of lumbar stenosis: a systematic review[J]. World Neurosurg, 2022, 168: 411-420. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2022.09.023
|
[10] |
杨海波, 李亚龙, 安帅. 单侧双通道内镜技术减压治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效分析[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2023, 44(4): 614-616.
|
[11] |
谢瑞, 于杰, 梁龙, 等. 腰椎管狭窄患者的手术和非手术治疗: 丹麦国家临床指南解读[J]. 天津中医药, 2020, 37(1): 33-37.
|
[12] |
朱凯, 田照民, 白杰, 等. 全内镜下椎板开窗术治疗退行性腰椎侧隐窝狭窄症[J]. 中国骨伤, 2023, 36(1): 5-11.
|
[13] |
张志强, 杨建东, 范新宇, 等. Endo-LOVE技术治疗重度脱垂型腰椎间盘突出症的效果分析[J]. 中华临床医师杂志(电子版), 2022, 16(1): 62-65.
|
[14] |
杨扬, 孔鹏, 魏传付, 等. 椎间孔镜可视环锯治疗老年腰椎间盘突出症[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2021, 29(11): 971-975.
|
[15] |
朱凯, 陈红梅, 崔洪鹏, 等. Endo-LOVE技术中应用可视环锯治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症的疗效分析[J]. 西部医学, 2023, 35(8): 1163-1166.
|
1. |
张成岗. 菌粒阴阳学说:基于“人微共生体”探讨中医阴阳学说的学术思考. 中华中医药学刊. 2023(03): 11-20+260 .
![]() | |
2. |
张成岗. 确保生物安全与发展生物经济的多维思考. 人民论坛·学术前沿. 2022(14): 37-46 .
![]() |