Citation: | WANG Guoli, YU Xuemei, ZHANG Ying. Application of non-cervical dilation hysteroscopic technique versus HEOS hysteroscopic technique in intrauterine adhesion separation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(20): 98-102. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242177 |
To investigate the application value of different hysteroscopic techniques in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions (IUA) and their effects on vascularfunction indicators.
A total of 102 patients with IUA from June 2021 to December 2022 were selected as study subjects and divided into two groups based on the random number table method, with 51 patients in each group. Both groups underwent hysteroscopic cold knife adhesiolysis. The observation group adopted non-cervical dilation hysteroscopic technique, while the control group adopted HEOS hysteroscopic technique. Surgical-related indicators, surgical efficacy, menstrual improvement as well as stress response before and after surgery, vascular function-related factors, and endometrial blood flow were observed in both groups. Postoperative complications, recurrence, and clinical pregnancy within 1-year follow-up were also recorded.
The operative time in the observation group was shorter, and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the total effective rate of surgical treatment between the observation group and the control group (P>0.05). The total improvement rate of menstruation in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(P < 0.05). Levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) increased at 24 hours after surgery and decreased at 48 hours after surgery compared with levels at 24 hours after surgery in both groups. Additionally, the observation group had lower levels than the control group at 24 and 48 h after surgery (P < 0.05). At 1- and 3-month after surgery, serum hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) levels decreased compared with pre-surgery levels in both groups, with the observation group showing lower levels than the control group (P < 0.05). At 1- and 3-month after surgery, vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), and vascularization flow index (VFI) increased compared with pre-surgery levels in both groups, with the observation group showing higher levels than the control group (P < 0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate at 1-year follow-up in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05).
Both non-cervical dilation hysteroscopic technique and HEOS hysteroscopic technique have good clinical effects and safety in the treatment of moderate IUA, but the former can optimize the operation process, reduce perioperative stress response, and improve patients' hemodynamics and menstrual status.
[1] |
许阡, 王祎祎, 臧春逸. 宫腔粘连临床病因学及诊疗研究进展[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志, 2021, 48(2): 224-229, 240.
|
[2] |
TAKASAKI K, HENMI H, IKEDA U, et al. Intrauterine adhesion after hysteroscopic myomectomy of submucous myomas[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2023, 49(2): 675-681. doi: 10.1111/jog.15499
|
[3] |
HOOKER A B, DE LEEUW R A, EMANUEL M H, et al. The link between intrauterine adhesions and impaired reproductive performance: a systematic review of the literature[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2022, 22(1): 837. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05164-2
|
[4] |
周兰, 梁国伟, 叶瑞珍. 彩超指引宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术的疗效及对患者子宫血流和生殖预后的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2022, 37(12): 2317-2320.
|
[5] |
何巍, 宋伟夫, 张秋月, 等. 宫腔镜下冷刀分离术对宫腔粘连患者宫腔形态恢复及妊娠结局的影响[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2023, 52(8): 982-986. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.08.009
|
[6] |
周朝. 中重度宫腔粘连术后再粘连影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(9): 2126-2128.
|
[7] |
EMINGR MICHAL, HALAJ MATUŠ, MALCÁK MICHAL, et al. Prevention of intrauterine adhesions[J]. Ceska Gynekol, 2023, 88(3): 210-213. doi: 10.48095/cccg2023210
|
[8] |
周琳琳, 王仲杰, 徐典, 等. 早期稽留流产术后宫腔粘连的影响因素分析及其预测模型构建[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(18): 107-112. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20232300
|
[9] |
AAGL Elevating Gynecologic Surgery. AAGL Practice Report: Practice Guidelines on Intrauterine Adhesions Developed in Collaboration With the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE)[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2017, 24(5): 695-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.008
|
[10] |
HELLMANN F, BERNABE R C, HOMEDES N. Post-trial provisions in the Declaration of Helsinki: a watered-down principle that needs to be strengthened[J]. J R Soc Med, 2022, 115(11): 420-423. doi: 10.1177/01410768221133567
|
[11] |
曹泽毅. 中华妇产科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 12-18.
|
[12] |
LI C, CAI A, SUN C, et al. The study on the safety and efficacy of amnion graft for preventing the recurrence of moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions[J]. Genes Dis, 2019, 7(2): 266-271.
|
[13] |
谭琳, 周静, 邱乐乐. 两种宫腔镜冷刀治疗中重度宫腔粘连的临床效果观察[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2023, 16(2): 127-130.
|
[14] |
YANG L Q, WANG L, CHEN Y, et al. Cold scissors versus electrosurgery for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: A meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(17): e25676.
|
[15] |
史靖, 张一帆. 宫腔镜下冷刀分离术对宫腔粘连患者炎性因子水平及复发率的影响[J]. 临床医学工程, 2022, 29(6): 761-762.
|
[16] |
邱爽, 张璇, 王晓庆. 血清TGF-β1、VEGF、HIF-1α在子宫内膜息肉患者中的表达及与息肉切除术后宫腔粘连关系[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2022, 23(5): 486-488.
|
[17] |
刘卫莉, 郝黎婷, 王慧慧, 等. 子宫内膜息肉宫腔镜切除术后复发的影响因素及模型预测[J]. 河南医学研究, 2024, 33(5): 832-837.
|
[18] |
郭罗培, 隋龙. 子宫内膜损伤修复与官腔粘连形成机制研究进展[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2019, 35(6): 706-709.
|
[19] |
YU J M, LI B, LI H Y, et al. Comparison of uterine, endometrial and subendometrial blood flows in predicting pregnancy outcomes between fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer after GnRH antagonist protocol: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2023, 43(1): 2195937.
|