WANG Guoli, YU Xuemei, ZHANG Ying. Application of non-cervical dilation hysteroscopic technique versus HEOS hysteroscopic technique in intrauterine adhesion separation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(20): 98-102. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242177
Citation: WANG Guoli, YU Xuemei, ZHANG Ying. Application of non-cervical dilation hysteroscopic technique versus HEOS hysteroscopic technique in intrauterine adhesion separation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(20): 98-102. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242177

Application of non-cervical dilation hysteroscopic technique versus HEOS hysteroscopic technique in intrauterine adhesion separation

More Information
  • Received Date: May 22, 2024
  • Revised Date: July 23, 2024
  • Objective 

    To investigate the application value of different hysteroscopic techniques in the treatment of intrauterine adhesions (IUA) and their effects on vascularfunction indicators.

    Methods 

    A total of 102 patients with IUA from June 2021 to December 2022 were selected as study subjects and divided into two groups based on the random number table method, with 51 patients in each group. Both groups underwent hysteroscopic cold knife adhesiolysis. The observation group adopted non-cervical dilation hysteroscopic technique, while the control group adopted HEOS hysteroscopic technique. Surgical-related indicators, surgical efficacy, menstrual improvement as well as stress response before and after surgery, vascular function-related factors, and endometrial blood flow were observed in both groups. Postoperative complications, recurrence, and clinical pregnancy within 1-year follow-up were also recorded.

    Results 

    The operative time in the observation group was shorter, and the intraoperative blood loss was less than that in the control group (P < 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in the total effective rate of surgical treatment between the observation group and the control group (P>0.05). The total improvement rate of menstruation in the observation group was higher than that in the control group(P < 0.05). Levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), C-reactive protein (CRP), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) increased at 24 hours after surgery and decreased at 48 hours after surgery compared with levels at 24 hours after surgery in both groups. Additionally, the observation group had lower levels than the control group at 24 and 48 h after surgery (P < 0.05). At 1- and 3-month after surgery, serum hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinase-1 (TIMP-1) levels decreased compared with pre-surgery levels in both groups, with the observation group showing lower levels than the control group (P < 0.05). At 1- and 3-month after surgery, vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), and vascularization flow index (VFI) increased compared with pre-surgery levels in both groups, with the observation group showing higher levels than the control group (P < 0.05). The clinical pregnancy rate at 1-year follow-up in the observation group was higher than that in the control group (P < 0.05).

    Conclusion 

    Both non-cervical dilation hysteroscopic technique and HEOS hysteroscopic technique have good clinical effects and safety in the treatment of moderate IUA, but the former can optimize the operation process, reduce perioperative stress response, and improve patients' hemodynamics and menstrual status.

  • [1]
    许阡, 王祎祎, 臧春逸. 宫腔粘连临床病因学及诊疗研究进展[J]. 国际妇产科学杂志, 2021, 48(2): 224-229, 240.
    [2]
    TAKASAKI K, HENMI H, IKEDA U, et al. Intrauterine adhesion after hysteroscopic myomectomy of submucous myomas[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol Res, 2023, 49(2): 675-681. doi: 10.1111/jog.15499
    [3]
    HOOKER A B, DE LEEUW R A, EMANUEL M H, et al. The link between intrauterine adhesions and impaired reproductive performance: a systematic review of the literature[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2022, 22(1): 837. doi: 10.1186/s12884-022-05164-2
    [4]
    周兰, 梁国伟, 叶瑞珍. 彩超指引宫腔镜下宫腔粘连分离术的疗效及对患者子宫血流和生殖预后的影响[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2022, 37(12): 2317-2320.
    [5]
    何巍, 宋伟夫, 张秋月, 等. 宫腔镜下冷刀分离术对宫腔粘连患者宫腔形态恢复及妊娠结局的影响[J]. 陕西医学杂志, 2023, 52(8): 982-986. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7377.2023.08.009
    [6]
    周朝. 中重度宫腔粘连术后再粘连影响因素分析[J]. 中国妇幼保健, 2021, 36(9): 2126-2128.
    [7]
    EMINGR MICHAL, HALAJ MATUŠ, MALCÁK MICHAL, et al. Prevention of intrauterine adhesions[J]. Ceska Gynekol, 2023, 88(3): 210-213. doi: 10.48095/cccg2023210
    [8]
    周琳琳, 王仲杰, 徐典, 等. 早期稽留流产术后宫腔粘连的影响因素分析及其预测模型构建[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2023, 27(18): 107-112. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20232300
    [9]
    AAGL Elevating Gynecologic Surgery. AAGL Practice Report: Practice Guidelines on Intrauterine Adhesions Developed in Collaboration With the European Society of Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE)[J]. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2017, 24(5): 695-705. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2016.11.008
    [10]
    HELLMANN F, BERNABE R C, HOMEDES N. Post-trial provisions in the Declaration of Helsinki: a watered-down principle that needs to be strengthened[J]. J R Soc Med, 2022, 115(11): 420-423. doi: 10.1177/01410768221133567
    [11]
    曹泽毅. 中华妇产科学[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2014: 12-18.
    [12]
    LI C, CAI A, SUN C, et al. The study on the safety and efficacy of amnion graft for preventing the recurrence of moderate to severe intrauterine adhesions[J]. Genes Dis, 2019, 7(2): 266-271.
    [13]
    谭琳, 周静, 邱乐乐. 两种宫腔镜冷刀治疗中重度宫腔粘连的临床效果观察[J]. 中国临床新医学, 2023, 16(2): 127-130.
    [14]
    YANG L Q, WANG L, CHEN Y, et al. Cold scissors versus electrosurgery for hysteroscopic adhesiolysis: A meta-analysis[J]. Medicine (Baltimore), 2021, 100(17): e25676.
    [15]
    史靖, 张一帆. 宫腔镜下冷刀分离术对宫腔粘连患者炎性因子水平及复发率的影响[J]. 临床医学工程, 2022, 29(6): 761-762.
    [16]
    邱爽, 张璇, 王晓庆. 血清TGF-β1、VEGF、HIF-1α在子宫内膜息肉患者中的表达及与息肉切除术后宫腔粘连关系[J]. 中国妇产科临床杂志, 2022, 23(5): 486-488.
    [17]
    刘卫莉, 郝黎婷, 王慧慧, 等. 子宫内膜息肉宫腔镜切除术后复发的影响因素及模型预测[J]. 河南医学研究, 2024, 33(5): 832-837.
    [18]
    郭罗培, 隋龙. 子宫内膜损伤修复与官腔粘连形成机制研究进展[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2019, 35(6): 706-709.
    [19]
    YU J M, LI B, LI H Y, et al. Comparison of uterine, endometrial and subendometrial blood flows in predicting pregnancy outcomes between fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfer after GnRH antagonist protocol: a retrospective cohort study[J]. J Obstet Gynaecol, 2023, 43(1): 2195937.
  • Related Articles

    [1]MA Linghua, LI Jiangheng, ZHONG Liuyu, HUANG Yongquan, ZHU Maoling. Clinical characteristics of pregnant woman in advanced maternal age and effect of pregnancy tests for pregnancy risks[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(9): 50-53. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214722
    [2]CHEN Peihong, JIN Hua, ZHANG Shan, YU Xuemei, DAI Jiarong, YI Jufen. The clinical significance of blood lipid level in patientswith gestational diabetes mellitus in late pregnancy and its impact on neonates[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(17): 96-98, 102. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201917027
    [3]ZHAO Yingwu, FU Ting. Clinical exploration on surgical methods for typeⅡ cesarean scar pregnancy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(15): 42-44. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201915011
    [4]ZHANG Feifeng, XIA Ping, LIN Hong. Clinical observation of transvaginal lesions excision in lower uterine segment scar pregnancy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (5): 116-118. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201805036
    [5]LI Haiyan, REN Jing, WEI Min. Clinical value of evidence-based nursing in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (8): 159-161. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201708047
    [6]NIE Qin. Clinical study of comprehensive nursing intervention on delivery of the pregnancy with scar uterus[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (4): 135-137. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201704041
    [7]MA Chun, TIAN Li. Influence of uterine perfusion with hCG in ovulatory period on endometrial pinopodes and clinical pregnancy rate in patients with RSA[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (21): 69-71,75. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201621021
    [8]CAO Xin, ZHANG Yan. Clinical application value of humane care in ectopic pregnancy nursing[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (22): 97-99. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201522032
    [9]Clinical observation on the time of termination of pregnancy and method of delivery in pregnant patients with hypertension[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (5): 135-138. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201405047
    [10]WU Meihua, ZHANG Ying. Application of clinical nursing pathway in pregnant women with intrahepatic cholestasis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (4): 62-64. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201404021
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(9)

    1. 冯嘉伟. 宫颈液基细胞学检查与宫颈病变临床病理分析. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志. 2024(06): 79-81 .
    2. 况漫,马亚琳,朱贵娟. 湖北十堰地区女性HPV感染分布及类型特征分析. 公共卫生与预防医学. 2023(01): 127-130 .
    3. 唐绥清. 液基细胞学检查及高危HPV检测联合阴道镜检查对宫颈癌筛查的临床意义. 中国社区医师. 2021(03): 141-142 .
    4. 付敏,陈路燕. HPV及TCT联合阴道镜活检在宫颈癌分层筛查中的临床应用价值. 当代医学. 2021(12): 74-76 .
    5. 王熙,王丽莎,杨翠,贾立云,潘雪娇,杨会欣,马翠霞,祁麟. 石家庄市育龄女性人乳头瘤病毒感染及病毒分型情况分析. 中国性科学. 2021(05): 84-87 .
    6. 田秋艳. 宫颈液基细胞学与人乳头瘤病毒检测在宫颈低级别上皮内病变中的相关性研究. 中国社区医师. 2021(29): 111-112 .
    7. 柏永华,曾丽莉,纪青. 宫颈液基细胞学检查对宫颈病变的筛查价值. 中国卫生标准管理. 2020(04): 122-124 .
    8. 刘群香,王莉,李江丽. 持续感染状态的HPV-16及HPV-58亚型在宫颈病变中的分布及危险因素. 河北医学. 2020(04): 541-545 .
    9. 唐永红,刘涛,彭健. 人乳头瘤病毒在宫颈病变中的感染分型及其特点. 系统医学. 2020(17): 134-136 .

    Other cited types(6)

Catalog

    Article views (78) PDF downloads (11) Cited by(15)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return