HUANG Tao, GAN Xuemei, CHEN Ming. Effect of aripitan combined with dexamethasone sodium phosphate and panolosetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy for osteosarcoma[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(5): 72-75. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202005018
Citation: HUANG Tao, GAN Xuemei, CHEN Ming. Effect of aripitan combined with dexamethasone sodium phosphate and panolosetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy for osteosarcoma[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(5): 72-75. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202005018

Effect of aripitan combined with dexamethasone sodium phosphate and panolosetron in prevention of nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy for osteosarcoma

More Information
  • Received Date: January 07, 2020
  • Available Online: August 26, 2020
  • Objective To observe the efficacy and safety of aripitan combined with dexamethasone sodium phosphate and panolosetron in preventing nausea and vomiting of patients with osteosarcoma after chemotherapy with cisplatin, epirubicin hydrochloride and ifosfamide. Methods A total of osteosarcoma patients who were given cisplatin plus epirubicin hydrochloride plus ifosfamide for chemotherapy were randomly divided into aripitan group(n=99)with triple antiemetic program and control group(n=98)with two antiemetic drug in combination. The complete response(CR)rates of nausea and vomiting and occurrence of adverse reactions at 0~24 h and >24~144 h were observed before chemotherapy, the first three times and latter three times of postoperative chemotherapies in the two groups were also observed. Results The complete remission rates in the aripitan group and control group were 75.76% and 70.41%, respectively at 0~24 h after chemotherapy, and no significant difference were observed(P>0.05), and 68.69% and 54.08%, respectively at >24~144 h, which showed significant difference(P<0.05). The complete remission rates in the aripitan group and control group were 67.68% and 61.22%, respectively at 0~24 h after the first three chemotherapies, but no significant difference were observed(P>0.05), and 59.60% and 44.90% - at >24~144 h, which showed significant difference(P<0.05). The complete remission rates in the aripitan group and control group were 52.53% and 50.00%, respectively at 0~24 h after latter three times of chemotherapies, there were no significant differences between the two groups(P>0.05), and were 46.46% and 32.65%, respectively at >24~144 h in the two groups, which showed significant difference(P<0.05). There were no differences before chemotherapy, after the first three times of chemotherapies and latter three times of chemotherapies in the incidence of adverse reactions between the two groups(P>0.05), but the incidence of adverse reactions in the aripitan group was slightly higher than that in the control group. Conclusion Aripitan combined with palonosetron hydrochloride and dexamethasone sodium phosphate has no significant effect on nausea and vomiting within 0~24 h after chemotherapy, and has a significant effect within >24~144 h. Besides, it has better efficacy, but the therapeutic effect gradually decreases with the repeated chemotherapies.
  • Clark-Snow R, Affronti M L, Rittenberg C N. Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting(CINV)and adherence to antiemetic guidelines: results of a survey of oncology nurses[J]. Support Care Cancer, 2018, 26(2): 557-564.
    Herrstedt J. Antiemetics: an update and the MASCC guidelines applied in clinical practice[J]. Nat Clin Pract Oncol, 2008, 5(1): 32-43.
    徐波. 化学治疗所致恶心、呕吐的护理指导[M]. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2015: 112-116.
    Chou A J, Gorlick R. Chemotherapy resistance in osteosarcoma: current challenges and future directions[J]. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2006, 6(7): 1075-1085.
    Wang S Y, Yang Z J, Zhang Z, et al. Aprepitant in the prevention of vomiting induced by moderately and highly emetogenic chemotherapy [J]. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2014, 15(23): 10045-10051.
    牛晓辉, 黄真, 张清. 软组织肉瘤化疗的研究现状[J]. 山东医药, 2011, 51(40): 46-47.
    Davis M P. New therapies for antiemetic prophylaxis for chemotherapy[J]. J Community Support Oncol, 2016, 14(1): 11-20.
    Rojas C, Slusher B S. Pharmacological mechanisms of 5-HT3 and tachykinin NK receptor antagonism to prevent chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2012, 684(1/2/3): 1-7.
    Rojas C, Raje M, Tsukamoto T, et al. Molecular mechanisms of 5-HT(3)and NK(1)receptor antagonists in prevention of Emesis[J]. Eur J Pharmacol, 2014, 722: 26-37.
    王丽, 杜艳丽, 江泽莹, 等. 自我效能干预联合药物治疗化疗性呕吐的研究[J]. 护理学杂志: 综合版, 2015(7): 41-43.
    Takahashi T, Hoshi E, Takagi M, et al. Multicenter, phase Ⅱ, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized study of aprepitant in Japanese patients receiving high-dose cisplatin[J]. Cancer Sci, 2010, 101(11): 2455-2461.
    黄鲁众, 张晓晔, 刘艳, 等. 阿瑞匹坦联合5-HT3受体拮抗剂和地塞米松预防化疗相关性恶心和呕吐的Meta分析[J]. 现代肿瘤医学, 2015, 23(15): 2198-2203.
    赵桂芳, 熊杰, 叶挺, 等. 阿瑞匹坦预防阿霉素联合异环磷酰胺方案化疗后呕吐的临床观察[J]. 肿瘤学杂志, 2017, 23(9): 802-806.
    宫晨, 熊华, 王建华, 等. 阿瑞匹坦对骨与软组织肉瘤患者强致吐风险化疗相关性呕吐的预防效果[J]. 医药导报, 2016, 35(11): 1198-1201.
    苏丹, 赵水喜, 曹京旭. 阿瑞匹坦预防化疗引起恶心呕吐的疗效及安全性[J]. 武警医学, 2016, 27(9): 871-873.
    丁海水. 不同剂量帕洛诺司琼用于预防腹腔镜下胆囊切除术后恶心呕吐的临床观察[J]. 江西医药, 2015, 50(11): 1274-1276.
    徐燕, 计张奕, 李玉芳. 泮托拉唑联合帕洛诺司琼防治肿瘤患者化疗所致胃肠道反应的疗效观察[J]. 临床合理用药杂志, 2016, 9(28): 42-43.
    孔翔, 高淑红, 林红梅. 帕洛诺司琼联合地塞米松预防术后恶心呕吐的Meta分析[J]. 中国当代医药, 2015, 22(25): 4-7

    , 11.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHANG Yuanfei. Diagnostic efficacy of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging combined with diffusion-weighted imaging for prostate cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(24): 26-30. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20242599
    [2]XU Haifeng, CHEN Kemin, ZHANG Yongli, WEN Feng, QIAN Bangwei. Value of magnetic resonance diffusion weighted imaging combined with perfusion weighted imaging in predicting final infarct volume of tumor-like cerebral infarction[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(11): 4-7, 38. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20211419
    [3]ZHOU Chunshan, HUANG Yan, YAN Wenchao. Value of computed tomography scan versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of pancreatic cystadenocarcinoma[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(20): 47-50. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202020013
    [4]GE Jiyuan, QIAN Chaoying, LUO Yifeng. Value of mammography combined with enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosing ductal carcinoma in situ[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(8): 18-22. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202008005
    [5]MA Xiaojing, YU Wuxia. Effect of magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosisof placenta previa complicating with placenta implantation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(24): 14-17. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201924005
    [6]HU Bo, WANG Xiaonan. Application of high resolution magnetic resonance imaging tube wall imaging technology in the diagnosis of intracranial atherosclerotic plaque[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(24): 5-7. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201924002
    [7]LI Xiaomin, HU Xiaoyun, LIU Renfei. Value of magnetic resonance imaging versus spiral CT in the diagnosis of biliary diseases[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(16): 33-36. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201916009
    [8]QIU Zhenqin, WANG Bingqiong. Influence of general anesthesia with propofol on serum neuron specific enolase and S100B protein levels and cognitive function in elderly patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (1): 39-41,55. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201601012
    [9]SUN Hongyue. Diagnostic value of 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging in benign and malignant lesion of breast cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2015, (19): 73-76. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201519022
    [10]The value of 3D SPACE technique with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative staging of rectal cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (11): 73-76. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201411022
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 刘晨,叶健文,王雪梅,李桦. 血清中微小RNA-506、微小RNA-934水平对胰腺癌患者术后生存结局的预测价值. 实用临床医药杂志. 2024(05): 40-43 . 本站查看
    2. 谢扬帆,曹玲敏,汪雪媛,林川,黄海溶. 中国胰腺癌患者肠道菌群多样性组成谱的系统评价. 中国循证医学杂志. 2023(02): 186-190 .
    3. 姚钧天,刘亮,郭津生. 胰腺癌的诊断与精准治疗. 西南医科大学学报. 2023(02): 110-115 .
    4. 丛鹏,苏祥杰,李永. 微小RNA-433-3p靶向滑蛋白调控胰腺癌PANC-1细胞恶性生物学行为的研究. 实用临床医药杂志. 2023(14): 19-25 . 本站查看
    5. 高春,江晶晶,冯富娟,甄英丽,张久聪,蒋觐阳. 基于CiteSpace的胰腺癌免疫治疗研究热点的可视化分析. 胃肠病学和肝病学杂志. 2023(11): 1262-1270 .

    Other cited types(2)

Catalog

    Article views (526) PDF downloads (12) Cited by(7)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return