Advance Search
FENG Jianping, XU Juan, ZHAO Juan, DAI Rongxiong, ZHANG Ping, LI Zhenyu, YANG Meiling. Effect of modified "Three-in-one" protection method in prevention of pressure injury in patients with prone position surgery by spinal robots[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(4): 19-21, 25. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210330
Citation: FENG Jianping, XU Juan, ZHAO Juan, DAI Rongxiong, ZHANG Ping, LI Zhenyu, YANG Meiling. Effect of modified "Three-in-one" protection method in prevention of pressure injury in patients with prone position surgery by spinal robots[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(4): 19-21, 25. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210330
shu

Effect of modified "Three-in-one" protection method in prevention of pressure injury in patients with prone position surgery by spinal robots

  • Operation Room, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Jiangsu Provincial People's Hospital, Nanjing, Jiangsu, 210029

More Information
  • Received Date: January 16, 2021
  • Available Online: March 14, 2021
  • Published Date: February 27, 2021
    Graphical Abstract
    • Abstract
  •   Objective  To investigate the effect of modified "Three-in-one" protection method in prevention of pressure injury (PI) in patients with prone position surgery by spinal robots.
      Methods  A total of 61 patients with interbody fusion cage implantation and bone graft fusion by spinal robots were randomly divided into observation group (n=31) and control group (n=30). The observation group was treated with modified "Three-in-one" protection method, that was the combination of paraffin oil, the melt blown nonwoven fabric and silicone gel pad processed by hydrophilic additives, while the control group was treated with the conventional method, that was the combination of liquid dressing, foam dressing and silicone gel pad. The postoperative condition of pressure on skin (including skin indentation, erythema, blister, damage, etc.) of the two groups were compared.
      Results  The incidence rates of PI in the regions of head and face, left hip and right hip in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence rate of mucinous skin injury in the observation group was 0, which was significantly lower than 16.67% (5/30) in the control group (P < .05).
      Conclusion  Application of modified "Three-in-one" protection method in prone position surgery by spinal robots can significantly reduce the incidence rates of PI and mucinous skin injury.
    • FullText(HTML)
    • References (22)
  • [1]
    杨英, 高兴莲, 余雷, 等. 骨科手术病人术中发生压力性损伤高危因素分析[J]. 护理研究, 2019, 33(4): 629-633. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ201904019.htm
    [2]
    FAN Y, JIN P D, LIU J J, et al. Radiological and clinical differences among three assisted technologies in pedicle screw fixation of adult degenerative scoliosis[J]. Sci Rep, 2018, 8(1): 890-899. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-19054-7
    [3]
    徐鹏, 葛鹏, 章仁杰, 等. 机器人辅助下椎弓根螺钉固定治疗胸腰椎骨折[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2018, 39(6): 687-690. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JYTZ201806002.htm
    [4]
    崔冠宇, 田伟, 何达, 等. 机器人引导下微创经椎间孔椎体间融合术和传统开放手术治疗腰椎滑脱症的疗效分析[J]. 中华外科杂志, 2017, 55(7): 543-548. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2017.07.013
    [5]
    田伟, 范明星, 韩晓光, 等. 机器人辅助与传统透视辅助脊柱椎弓根螺钉内固定的临床对比研究[J]. 骨科临床与研究杂志, 2016, 1(1): 4-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GKLC201601004.htm
    [6]
    范明星, 刘亚军, 段芳芳, 等. 机器人辅助胸腰椎椎弓根螺钉内固定术的学习曲线和临床意义[J]. 骨科临床与研究杂志, 2018, 3(4): 213-217. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-GKLC201804007.htm
    [7]
    WENK M, PÖPPING D, HENNING M, et al. Creation of a head and face protection device for children undergoing procedures in prone position[J]. Paediatr Anaesth, 2009, 19(6): 587-592. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9592.2009.03008.x
    [8]
    李秀文, 王莉梅, 林美芳, 等. 不同俯卧位安置法在脊柱外科手术中的应用[J]. 上海护理, 2015, 15(6): 8-10. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SHHL201506005.htm
    [9]
    高兴莲, 熊璨, 杨英, 等. 术中压力性损伤患者围手术期特征的回顾性分析[J]. 护理学杂志, 2020, 35(3): 42-45. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ202003014.htm
    [10]
    廖春燕. 压疮发生的相关危险因素及护理进展[J]. 齐鲁护理杂志, 2016, 22(5): 49-51. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-7256.2016.05.023
    [11]
    谢玮娜, 于美华, 何丽云, 等. 液体石蜡油预防俯卧位手术患者面部压疮的效果评价[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2015, 30(13): 1210-1211. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX201513028.htm
    [12]
    GOODWIN C R, RECINOS P F, OMEIS I, et al. Prevention of facial pressure ulcers using the Mayfield clamp for sacral tumor resection[J]. J Neurosurg Spine, 2011, 14(1): 85-87. doi: 10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09516
    [13]
    杨海芳, 周卫萍, 杨婉英, 等. 凝胶体位垫联合伤口敷料贴预防脊柱后路手术患者发生压力性损伤的效果[J]. 解放军护理杂志, 2018, 35(22): 71-73. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9993.2018.22.016
    [14]
    马圆圆, 刘媛, 胡爱玲. 基于循证预防术中压力性损伤集束化护理方案的制定及临床应用[J]. 中国实用护理杂志, 2019, 35(33): 2579-2583. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1672-7088.2019.33.005
    [15]
    恽文娟, 宋凯飞, 徐宇红. 泡沫敷料反向粘贴法改善护士器械相关性压力损伤的效果[J]. 护理研究, 2020, 34(7): 1134-1136. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ202007008.htm
    [16]
    张诗怡, 赵体玉, 余云红, 等. 多学科团队合作预防脊柱后入路手术患者术中压力性损伤[J]. 护理学杂志, 2019, 34(10): 59-61. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLXZ201910019.htm
    [17]
    魏彦姝, 武沛璋, 刘晓华, 等. 基于敏感风险指标的术中PI链式管理策略[J]. 护理研究, 2019, 33(6): 966-969. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXHZ201906012.htm
    [18]
    唐静萍, 皮红英. 压疮评估研究护理[J]. 护理研究, 2016, 30(9): 3340-3341. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XYZL201718063.htm
    [19]
    张萌萌, 赵丹, 徐诚实, 等. 骨科机器人辅助下脊柱胸腰椎手术的护理配合[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2020, 35(11): 1022-1024. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX202011016.htm
    [20]
    张志慧. 建立全麻俯卧位头面部压红三级质量控制指标的追踪效果评价[J]. 护士进修杂志, 2017, 32(16): 1491-1492. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FSJX201716018.htm
    [21]
    张莹, 王菲. 行动研究在预防术中PI护理流程改进中的应用[J]. 护理学报, 2018, 25(16): 14-18. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NFHL201816005.htm
    [22]
    夏冬云, 史婷奇, 陆巍, 等. PI临床决策支持系统的研发与应用[J]. 中华护理杂志, 2020, 55(1): 50-54. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZHHL202001011.htm
    • Related Articles

  • Related Articles

    [1]CHENG Hongjuan, ZHOU Wei, ZHA Bai, WANG Jianping, CHEN Qiming, WU Xiaorong. Effects of individualized nutrition intervention on sarcopenia and quality of life in maintenance hemodialysis patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(15): 62-67. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20231695
    [2]XU Chunhong, LIU Yushuang, JIAO Chunyan. Effect of intensive health management on blood pressure and quality of life in patients with hypertension[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(18): 68-70. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202018019
    [3]WANG Yan. Effect of collaborative nursing on chemotherapy-related adverse reaction and quality of life in patients with breast cancer undergoing radical mastectomy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (12): 109-112. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201812032
    [4]ZHANG Chunyan, HUANG Xiaoli, WANG Ying. Effect of psychological care on life quality and treatment compliance of patients with liver cirrhosis[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (2): 49-51. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201802015
    [5]LI Ling, CHEN Dan. Effect of integrated treatment of traditional Chinese and western medicine on improvement of gross motor function and quality of life in children with cerebral palsy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (13): 83-87. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201713022
    [6]LYU Yan, WU Yushu, GAO Feng. Effect of respiratory training on respiratory function and life quality of patients with advanced lung cancer during chemotherapy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (6): 33-35. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201706010
    [7]FAN Jie. Influence of kushen injection on pain state, immune state and life quality of rectal cancer patients with chemotherapy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (5): 72-74. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201705020
    [8]LI Min, ZHANG Tao, HE Chunying. Influence of high quality nursing on psychological state and quality of life of patients with esophageal cancer undergoing radiotherapy combined with depression[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (2): 33-36. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201702011
    [9]SUN Chao, YIN Li, ZHU Jing, JIANG Minfeng, YAO Yong. Application of visual function and quality of life scale in evaluation of phacoemulsification in patients with cataract[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (19): 68-70. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201619020
    [10]CHU Juan. Effect analysis of nursing intervention on quality of life of acute myocardial infarction patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (14): 20-22. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201414007

  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 王代平，王世平，何学东，马伟，钟庆. 单孔与多孔亚肺叶切除术治疗早期非小细胞肺癌的疗效探讨. 腹腔镜外科杂志. 2024(03): 179-183 .
    2. 陈佩佩. 胸腔镜手术治疗老年非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效及并发症发生率分析. 智慧健康. 2024(26): 39-41 .
    3. 王维，邵敬，吕玉淳，杨芳. 胸腔镜下肺叶切除术对NSCLC患者临床效果及TPA、SCC、CYFRA21-1水平的影响. 分子诊断与治疗杂志. 2023(06): 1016-1020 .
    4. 杨房，翟波，崔亚洲. 电视胸腔镜手术在小儿肺叶切除中的效果分析. 实用医技杂志. 2022(02): 182-184 .
    5. 吕冬琴，徐磊，朱启航，朱贤胜. 超声测量膈肌移动度评估电视辅助胸腔镜手术肺叶及肺段切除后膈肌功能恢复的价值. 实用临床医药杂志. 2022(05): 10-13 . 本站查看
    6. 张铭岳，关永信. 两孔胸腔镜肺叶切除及系统性淋巴结清扫手术治疗肺癌患者的临床疗效. 中国医药指南. 2022(17): 79-81 .
    7. 邬艺忠，彭勇，张广云，江振强，王荣. 电视胸腔镜肺叶切除术对非小细胞肺癌患者心肺功能指标的影响. 医学食疗与健康. 2022(05): 52-55 .
    8. 康颖颖，郑韶，周彪. 胸段硬膜外阻滞与胸椎旁阻滞对肺癌开胸手术患者肺功能及炎症因子的影响. 河南医学研究. 2021(34): 6403-6405 .
    9. 黄芳，吴燕. 负氧离子联合康复运动对老年肺叶切除术后肺功能的影响. 中国实用护理杂志. 2021(36): 2837-2842 .
    10. 方桓. VATS辅助下小切口行肿瘤切除、系统纵隔淋巴结清扫术治疗肺癌的效果. 中外医学研究. 2020(03): 152-154 .
    11. 赵富周. 电视胸腔镜下肺叶切除术对非小细胞肺癌患者肺功能、生活质量及预后的影响. 中国疗养医学. 2020(03): 300-302 .
    12. 王江波. 胸腔镜下肺叶切除术治疗非小细胞肺癌的临床疗效观察. 首都食品与医药. 2020(07): 44 .
    13. 张华锋. 胸腔镜肺癌手术治疗老年非小细胞肺癌的临床分析. 医药论坛杂志. 2020(05): 87-89 .
    14. 周晓林，单玉兰，丁荷蓓，莫进海，谭卫卫. 七氟烷联合丙泊酚麻醉对老年肺癌患者胸腔镜术后疼痛及肺部并发症的影响. 国际老年医学杂志. 2020(06): 387-390 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Get Citation
    PDF
    XML
    Article views (294) PDF downloads (14) Cited by(15)
    Turn off MathJax
    Article Contents
    Abstract
    References
    Related Articles

    © 2020 《实用临床医药杂志》编辑部

    Address: 江苏省扬州市江阳中路136号，扬州大学江阳路北校区14号楼201室China Pos: 225009Tel: 0514-87978917、87978989、87978807

    苏公网安备 32100302010246号

    Supported by: Beijing Renhe Information Technology Co., Ltd.   Baidu Analytics

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return