CHEN Jiaru, ZENG Sheng, XIAO Chao. Effects of different vertebroplasty on refracture of adjacent vertebral bodies in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(9): 29-31. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210489
Citation: CHEN Jiaru, ZENG Sheng, XIAO Chao. Effects of different vertebroplasty on refracture of adjacent vertebral bodies in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(9): 29-31. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20210489

Effects of different vertebroplasty on refracture of adjacent vertebral bodies in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures

More Information
  • Received Date: January 25, 2021
  • Available Online: May 20, 2021
  • Published Date: May 14, 2021
  •   Objective  To investigate the effects of percutaneous kyphoplasty (PKP) and percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) on refracture of adjacent vertebral bodies in patients with osteoporotic vertebral fractures.
      Methods  A total of 273 patients undergoing vertebral augmentation were selected as the study subjects. Among them, 39 cases had recurrent vertebral fractures and 234 cases had no recurrent vertebral fractures. The patient's general information, history, and fracture status (whether or not the patient suffered from refracture, the interval between the refracture and the first operation, the segment of the refracture, irregular anti-osteoporosis treatment, the amount of bone cement, the penetration of bone cement, and the change of Cobb angle) were recorded.
      Results  Among the 273 patients, 134 cases underwent PKP and 139 cases underwent PVP. The proportion of patients with refracture after PKP was 30.77% (12/134), which was significantly lower than 69.23% (27/139) of patients with refracture after PVP. The rate of bone cement leakage in PKP was 11.19% (15/134), which was significantly lower than 22.30%(31/139) in PVP. Preoperative and postoperative Cobb angle changes in patients receiving PKP vertebral body enhancement were greater than those receiving PVP vertebral body enhancement.
      Conclusion  The effect of PKP for patients' postoperative rehabilitation and prevention of re-fracture is better than that of PVP.
  • [1]
    黄天霁, 寇玉辉, 殷晓峰, 等. 椎体强化术后再发椎体骨折的临床特点和危险因素[J]. 北京大学学报: 医学版, 2015, 47(2): 237-241. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-167X.2015.02.009
    [2]
    郑明宗. 骨水泥的分布与灌注量对骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折疗效影响研究[D]. 广州: 广州医科大学, 2018.
    [3]
    PAN M, GE J, LI Q, et al. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation in special Genant Ⅳ osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures[J]. J Orthop Translat, 2020, 20: 94-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jot.2019.07.002
    [4]
    苏丽. 经皮锥体成型术治疗老年人骨质疏松性锥体压缩性骨折疗效观察与临床护理[J]. 护理实践与研究, 2011, 8(7): 44-46. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HLSJ201107024.htm
    [5]
    李亚军, 王业华, 方贻铃, 等. 椎体强化术后骨水泥相对终板的位置对邻椎再骨折的影响[J]. 实用骨科杂志, 2019, 25(9): 769-772, 780. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SGKZ201909001.htm
    [6]
    杨辉, 张家立, 李奕军, 等. 骨质疏松骨折患者骨水泥分布类型对椎体强化术后再骨折的影响[J]. 实用医学杂志, 2019, 6(12): 17-19. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYYZ201912016.htm
    [7]
    NORIEGA D, MARCIA S, THEUMANN N, et al. A prospective, international, randomized, noninferiority study comparing an implantable titanium vertebral augmentation device versus balloon kyphoplasty in the reduction of vertebral compression fractures (SAKOS study)[J]. Spine J, 2019, 19(11): 1782-1795. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2019.07.009
    [8]
    文豪, 刘元, 张柯, 等. 椎体强化术骨水泥渗漏并发症及预防的研究进展[J]. 中国矫形外科杂志, 2019, 27(12): 1111-1115. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZJXS201912015.htm
    [9]
    唐永超, 李永贤, 张顺聪, 等. 骨水泥椎体强化术后椎体再塌陷的危险因素分析[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2017, 27(11): 985-990. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2017.11.05
    [10]
    谷千江. 胸腰椎骨折行短节段经伤椎内固定手术后再发后凸畸形的相关因素Logistic回归分析[J]. 颈腰痛杂志, 2020, 41(1): 51-54. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-7234.2020.01.015
    [11]
    李凡杰, 杜怡斌, 刘艺明, 等. 椎体成形与弯角椎体成形治疗骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折: 骨水泥注射后分布与渗漏率的比较[J]. 中国组织工程研究, 2020, 24(10): 1484-1490. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-4344.2248
    [12]
    边树愿, 郭涛. 骨质疏松性椎体压缩骨折经皮椎体强化术后椎体高度再丢失的研究进展[J]. 中国脊柱脊髓杂志, 2018, 28(7): 663-666. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2018.07.15
  • Related Articles

    [1]JIA Chuan, YU Weizhong, WANG Yuchen, QIAN Zhipeng, HE Zhangning, ZHU Wenke. Proximal femoral bionic intramedullary nail versus InterTAN intramedullary nail in the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures in elderly patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(21): 88-91. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20232369
    [2]ZHANG Sheng, WANG Chao, WANG Deli. Two kinds of artificial joint replacement versus proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail in treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(22): 113-116. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20212208
    [3]TANG Daibin, ZHU Ping, SUN Jinya, ZHU Xiaokong, YANG Jinghui, SU Ping, SUN Deyong, YAN Xiufang, ZHAO Wei. Effect of coagulation disorders on score of Activity of Daily Living in patients with heat stroke[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(24): 80-84. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202024024
    [4]SI Zhengtao, YANG Yongqiang. Internal fixation with proximal femoral nail antirotation versus internal fixation with dynamic hip screw in treatment of patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(3): 105-107. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202003030
    [5]LIU Qianxing, HE Dizhen. Effect of percutaneous anti-rotation of the proximal femoral nail internal fixation on hip joint function and quality of life in elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(21): 88-91. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201921025
    [6]SHAO Fang. Effect of early operation with proximal femoral anti-rotation intramedullary nail on the prognosis of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture of femur[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(16): 86-88, 92. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201916023
    [7]WEI Shuyi, LI Tongxiang. Proximal femoral nail antirotation versus internal fixation with locking plate in the treatment of elderly patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(7): 87-90. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201907023
    [8]JIANG Zhigang, MA Zhaolong, YANG Wengui. Application of external fixator and proximal femoral nail anti-rotation in treatment of elderly patients with intertrochanteric fracture[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (11): 59-61,69. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201611017
    [9]YE Caixia, LIU Jiarui, CHEN Jie. Influence of pain-improving nursing on activity of daily living in patients with total hip replacement[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (10): 106-108. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201410038
    [10]GE Meihong, XIAO Yuhua, ZHU Yuhui. Influence of early rehabilitation intervention on daily living activities of patients with severe stroke[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (20): 26-29. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201320009

Catalog

    Article views (350) PDF downloads (12) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return