CHENG Mei, FANG Zhaohui, CHENG Ruodong, QIAO Lulu. Effect of ultrasonic debridement combined with traditional Chinese medicine foot bath on Wagner grade 2 and 3 ulcer of diabetic foot[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(17): 116-119. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221212
Citation: CHENG Mei, FANG Zhaohui, CHENG Ruodong, QIAO Lulu. Effect of ultrasonic debridement combined with traditional Chinese medicine foot bath on Wagner grade 2 and 3 ulcer of diabetic foot[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(17): 116-119. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221212

Effect of ultrasonic debridement combined with traditional Chinese medicine foot bath on Wagner grade 2 and 3 ulcer of diabetic foot

More Information
  • Received Date: April 12, 2022
  • Available Online: September 20, 2022
  • Objective 

    To observe the therapeutic effect of ultrasound debridement and traditional Chinese medicine foot bath in Wagner grade 2 or grade 3 ulcer of diabetic foot.

    Methods 

    A total of 60 patients with Wagner grade 2 or grade 3 ulser in diabetic foot were selected and randomly divided into observation group (30 patients) and control group(30 patients). The observation group was treated with ultrasonic debridement combined with traditional Chinese medicine foot bath, and the control group was treated with mechanical surgical debridement. Four weeks later, the wound healing and the changes of hypersensitive C reactive protein and procalcitonin levels of the two groups were recorded, and the overall treatment effect was observed.

    Results 

    After 4 weeks of treatment, the wound area of the observation group was (1.86±0.61) cm2, and the wound reduction rate was (86.13±12.36)%, while the wound area of the control group was (4.53±0.87) cm2, and the wound reduction rate was (52.28±14.57)%. The wound area of the observation group was smaller than that of the control group, and the wound reduction rate was higher than that of the control group (P < 0.05). After treatment, high sensitivity C-reactive protein and procalcitonin in the observation group were (6.42±1.82) mg/L and (0.21±0.16) ng/L, respectively, which were lower than (12.38±2.46) mg/L and (0.35±0.32) ng/L in the control group (P < 0.05). The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 83.33%, which was higher than 56.67% of the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).

    Conclusion 

    Treatment of ultrasonic debridement and Chinese medicine foot bath can promote granulation tissue growth, wound healing and improve blood circulation of affected limb, which is worth of clinical promotion and application.

  • [1]
    中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国2型糖尿病防治指南(2020年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2021, 13(4): 315-409. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYNK202108007.htm
    [2]
    中华医学会糖尿病学分会. 中国糖尿病足防治指南(2019年版)[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2019, 11(2): 92-108.
    [3]
    SLAHOR L, ISELIN L. Diabetic foot syndrome[J]. Ther Umsch, 2020, 77(7): 339-346. doi: 10.1024/0040-5930/a001201
    [4]
    许樟荣, 冉兴无. 糖尿病创面的内科诊治[M]. 郑州: 郑州大学出版社, 2019: 227-233.
    [5]
    林彬, 林昱, 林若清, 等. 超声清创术在糖尿病足溃疡治疗中的应用效果[J]. 中国实用医药, 2017, 12(7): 63-65. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZSSA201707027.htm
    [6]
    中国医疗保健国际交流促进会糖尿病足分会. 中国糖尿病足诊治指南[J]. 中华医学杂志, 2017, 97(4): 251-257. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZLYS202001008.htm
    [7]
    中国微循环学会周围血管疾病专业委员会糖尿病足学组. 糖尿病足创面修复专家共识[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2018, 10(5): 305-309.
    [8]
    COFFEY L, MAHON C, GALLAGHER P. Perceptions and experiences of diabetic foot ulceration and foot care in people with diabetes: A qualitative meta-synthesis[J]. Int Wound J, 2019, 16(1): 183-210. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13010
    [9]
    李海霞, 李娟, 陈涛, 等. 中药熏洗结合西医常规疗法治疗老年前期糖尿病足临床研究[J]. 国际中医中药杂志, 2018, 40(3): 205-208. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-NZYY202005085.htm
    [10]
    俎景林. 糖尿病足溃疡患者经超声清创术治疗前后氧化应激标志物的变化及疗效分析[J]. 医学理论与实践, 2019, 32(18): 2939-2941. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXLL201918042.htm
    [11]
    陶贵录, 王晶, 金玲, 等. 医用五谷虫治疗糖尿病足的效果及其对Notch1 mRNA表达的影响[J]. 中国医师进修杂志, 2021(11): 1025-1028. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZYHS200408056.htm
    [12]
    曹烨民, 赵诚, 赵满忱. 糖尿病足高危人群的中医药治疗[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2018, 10(7): 500-502.
    [13]
    韦洁明, 颜晓东, 黄秀禄. 两种伤口负压治疗模式对糖尿病足溃疡治疗作用的比较[J]. 中华糖尿病杂志, 2020, 12(4): 246-250. https://cdmd.cnki.com.cn/Article/CDMD-10598-1019108816.htm
    [14]
    施劭锋, 苏广瑞, 林日昌, 等. 超声清创术联合简易负压封闭引流技术在糖尿病足溃疡中的应用[J]. 白求恩医学杂志, 2016, 14(2): 186-188. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BQEN201602028.htm
    [15]
    陈伟彬, 聂运修. 超声清创术联合负压封闭引流技术治疗糖尿病足溃疡效果分析[J]. 白求恩医学杂志, 2017, 15(2): 243-244. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BQEN201702059.htm
    [16]
    张高明. 超声清创术联合封闭式负压引流技术对糖尿病足创面愈合的影响[J]. 现代诊断与治疗, 2019, 30(18): 3269-3271. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-XDZD201918072.htm
    [17]
    马书平, 马立人, 李亚飞, 等. 超声清创术联合中药灌洗负压技术治疗湿热型糖尿病足创面的临床观察[J]. 中国中医药现代远程教育, 2019, 17(10): 107-110. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZYY201910046.htm
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZOU Yingcai, ZHOU Li, WANG Jiangning, GAO Lei. Effects of antibiotic-loaded bone cement coverage versus negative pressure wound therapy on diabetic foot ulcer wound healing[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(23): 105-109, 115. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20243314
    [2]ZHANG Yunxin, JIA Wei, CHENG Zhiyuan, JIANG Peng. Correlation between the Controlling Nutritional Status score and wound repair of diabetic foot ulcer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(16): 79-82. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20240563
    [3]CHEN Xilin, SHI Dazhuo, DUAN Hongyan, JIA Junfeng, JIA Shan, JIANG Guodan, LI Dongbing, LI Hengshuang, LI Jinjun, LIU Renghai, LANG Na, MENG Qingcheng, KANG Chunbo, QI Baoju, QIN Pengpai, REN Yi, TAN Siwei, ZHANG Shuling, ZHANG Shurong, ZHANG Xuewei, ZHANG Yuru, ZHAO Yan, ZHU Huiqing, CUI Hongli, XIE Zhennian, AN Xiaojing, SANG Jie, MIAO Chunhong, WANG Fangli. Expert consensus on management standard of wound repair after anorectal surgery(2019)[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(4): 1-4. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202004001
    [4]ZHANG Lei, SHEN Jinhu, YANG Liuzhong, ZHANG Zhen, LI Chaoding, LUO Zhongwei, CHENG Fei. Effect of Qufu Shengji Ointment combined with island-shaped stamp skin-grafting for large area infected wounds[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(2): 38-40. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202002011
    [5]LI Yanhui, ZHANG Li, XIAO Houan. Therapeutic effect of local oxygen therapy on woundhealing in patients with chronic wound skin graft[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2019, 23(13): 27-29. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201913007
    [6]QIAN Mingfang, XUE Qiang. Effect of high flow oxygen therapy in the treatment of red hip wounds in infants[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (10): 83-85. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201810024
    [7]ZHANG Lili, PENG Xiaorong, ZHANG Wenfeng, LIAN Jie. Nursing of vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of orthopedic trauma and infected wound[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (4): 98-100. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201704030
    [8]ZHANG Yajun, PEI Yiming, WANG Yinxia, HAN Jian. Application and nursing of vacuum sealing drainage in the treatment of infectious wounds in orthopaedics department[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2016, (6): 80-82. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201606025
    [9]HU Liang, SUN Bingwei, XIAO Guixi, YU Ye. Effect of bioactive glass combined with bath therapy on treatment of patients with residual burn wound[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (9): 72-75. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201409020
    [10]XU Lamei. Nursing for patients with granulation edema of wound by treatment of modified vacuum aspiration dressing[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (22): 59-61. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201322021

Catalog

    Article views (148) PDF downloads (13) Cited by()

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return