Citation: | WANG Hui, ZHA Hailing, MA Pei, YU Feihong. Predictive value of ultrasound elastography in axillary lymph node metastasis in early small breast cancer[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(5): 6-10, 15. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20223474 |
To investigate the predictive value of conventional ultrasound combined with ultrasound elastography in axillary lymph node metastasis of early small breast cancer.
A total of 150 female breast cancer patients were selected. According to the histopathological results, the patients were divided into axillary lymph node metastasis group (44 cases) and axillary lymph node non-metastatic group (106 cases). Conventional ultrasound was performed on the breast mass and axillary lymph nodes, and ultrasound elastography was performed on the mass. The correlations between the axillary lymph node metastasis and the ultrasound image of the mass and the elastic features of the mass were analyzed.
Univariate analysis showed that breast mass elasticity score, histopathological grade, axillary lymph node minor diameter, cortical thickness, blood supply type and disappearance of lymphatic hilum were correlated with lymph node metastasis (P < 0.05). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that mass elasticity score (P=0.007) and cortical lymph node thickness (P < 0.001) were independent influencing factors for axillary lymph node metastasis in early small breast cancer.
Conventional ultrasound combined with ultrasound elastography is of great value in predicting axillary lymph node metastasis of early small breast cancer, which is conducive to early diagnosis, early treatment and improvement the prognosis of patients.
[1] |
SIEGEL R L, MILLER K D, JEMAL A. Cancer statistics, 2018[J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2018, 68(1): 7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21442
|
[2] |
MAESHIMA Y, SAKAI T, OGIYA A, et al. Assessment of axillary node status by ultrasound after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer according to breast cancer subtype[J]. Sci Rep, 2021, 11(1): 10858. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89738-8
|
[3] |
陈智慧, 查海玲, 蔡梦君, 等. HER2+乳腺癌超声特征预测腋窝淋巴结转移价值分析[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2022, 31(4): 419-424. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXYX202204010.htm
|
[4] |
熊朝月, 周敏, 何小芳, 等. 基于超声特征联合临床资料的预测模型对早期乳腺癌患者腋窝淋巴结转移的评估价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(12): 14-18, 22. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20220195
|
[5] |
笪霞, 纪璟, 朱春花, 等. 乳腺癌患者保乳术联合腔镜腋窝淋巴结清扫术的临床研究[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(8): 49-53. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20214131
|
[6] |
D'ORSI C, MORRIS E, MENDELSON E, et al. ACR BIRADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System[M]. Reston: American College of Radiology, 2013: 121-140.
|
[7] |
ADLER D D, CARSON P L, RUBIN J M, et al. Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 1990, 16(6): 553-559. doi: 10.1016/0301-5629(90)90020-D
|
[8] |
ITOH A, UENO E, TOHNO E, et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis[J]. Radiology, 2006, 239(2): 341-350. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2391041676
|
[9] |
ELSTON C W, ELLIS I O. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up[J]. Histopathology, 2010, 19(5): 403-410.
|
[10] |
HAMMOND M E, HAYES D F, DOWSETT M, et al. American Society of Clinical Oncology/College Of American Pathologists guideline recommendations for immunohistochemical testing of estrogen and progesterone receptors in breast cancer[J]. J Clin Oncol, 2010, 28(16): 2784-2795. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6529
|
[11] |
SCHNITT S J. Will molecular classification replace traditional breast pathology?[J]. Int J Surg Pathol, 2010, 18(3 Suppl): 162S-166S.
|
[12] |
张曼琪, 查海玲, 刘心培, 等. 超声检查评估乳腺癌新辅助化疗疗效的准确性及影响因素分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(13): 45-49, 54. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20220387
|
[13] |
解松刚, 梁成通, 周丽娟, 等. 乳腺癌肺转移患者预后危险因素的分析及诺模图的构建[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2022, 26(18): 48-56. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20220717
|
[14] |
周敏, 朱峰, 王小燕, 等. 乳腺癌早期诊断中乳腺超声检查的漏诊、误诊病例特征及影响因素的回顾性分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(24): 35-38. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20213648
|
[15] |
HAN P, YANG H P, LIU M, et al. Lymph node predictive model with in vitro ultrasound features for breast cancer lymph node metastasis[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2020, 46(6): 1395-1402.
|
[16] |
KEYKHAEI M, ASHRAF H, RASHEDI S, et al. Differences in the 2020 ESC versus 2015 ESC and 2014 ACC/AHA guidelines on the management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation[J]. Curr Atheroscler Rep, 2021, 23(12): 77.
|
[17] |
CHANG J M, SHIN H J, CHOI J S, et al. Imaging protocol and criteria for evaluation of axillary lymph nodes in the NAUTILUS trial[J]. J Breast Cancer, 2021, 24(6): 554-560.
|
[18] |
伍锦凤, 桂照华, 闫红. 乳腺浸润性癌组织人表皮生长因子受体-2基因扩增状态与蛋白表达的比较及其与临床病理特征的相关性[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(13): 40-44. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20211659
|
[19] |
CHANG J M, LEUNG J W T, MOY L, et al. Axillary nodal evaluation in breast cancer: state of the art[J]. Radiology, 2020, 295(3): 500-515.
|
[20] |
RUKANSKIENE D, VEIKUTIS V, JONAITIENE E, et al. Preoperative axillary ultrasound versus sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early breast cancer[J]. Medicina (Kaunas), 2020, 56(3): 127.
|
[21] |
LIM G H, TEO S Y, ALLEN J C Jr, et al. Determining whether high nodal burden in early breast cancer patients can be predicted preoperatively to avoid sentinel lymph node biopsy[J]. J Breast Cancer, 2019, 22(1): 67-76.
|
[22] |
周雪雁, 潘晓芳, 王坤, 等. 三维剪切波弹性成像定量参数预测乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的价值[J]. 肿瘤影像学, 2022, 31(3): 269-274. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXYX202203009.htm
|
[23] |
YI C B, DING Z Y, DENG J, et al. Combining the ultrasound features of primary tumor and axillary lymph nodes can reduce false-negative rate during the prediction of high axillary node burden in BI-RADS category 4 or 5 breast cancer lesions[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2020, 46(8): 1941-1948.
|
[24] |
XU H, XU G L, LI X D, et al. Correlation between the contrast-enhanced ultrasound image features and axillary lymph node metastasis of primary breast cancer and its diagnostic value[J]. Clin Transl Oncol, 2021, 23(1): 155-163.
|
[25] |
徐燕军, 邓一帆, 胡兵, 等. 二维超声联合实时组织弹性成像鉴别诊断乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的价值[J]. 声学技术, 2021, 40(3): 370-375. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SXJS202103012.htm
|
[26] |
张娜娜, 沈滨, 陈晰, 等. 微小核糖核酸在乳腺癌中的研究进展[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2021, 25(4): 106-110, 115. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.20201506
|
[27] |
吴延琴, 赵巧玲, 辛亚军. 超声诊断乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的影像学表现及其临床效果观察[J]. 影像研究与医学应用, 2022, 6(3): 53-55. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-YXYY202203018.htm
|
[28] |
LIU H, WAN J, XU G. Conventional US and 2-D shear wave elastography of virtual touch tissue imaging quantification: correlation with immunohistochemical subtypes of breast cancer[J]. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2019, 45(10): 2612-2622.
|
[29] |
EVANS A, RAUCHHAUS P, WHELEHAN P, et al. Does shear wave ultrasound independently predict axillary lymph node metastasis in women with invasive breast cancer[J]. Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2014, 143(1): 153-157.
|
[30] |
王修军, 易君, 张欢欢. 基于多维度指标建立预测模型在乳腺癌病人腋窝淋巴结转移的应用价值[J]. 蚌埠医学院学报, 2022, 47(8): 1066-1069, 1073. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-BANG202208018.htm
|
1. |
张爱华,周守群,郭婉清,林伟伟,陈燕萍,黄素珍,鞠芳. 建立基于常规超声及双模态弹性成像的乳腺癌腋窝淋巴结转移的无创预测模型. 现代医药卫生. 2025(01): 34-39+44 .
![]() | |
2. |
景晓锐,刘佳,孙飞,王佳,赵国宏,张文成,高彬. 2型糖尿病患者胰腺硬度与胰岛功能关系的研究. 空军军医大学学报. 2025(02): 222-225 .
![]() |