Most Viewed
- User statistics ranking in the last month (excluding this month)
- User statistics ranking within half a year (excluding this month)
- User statistics ranking within one year (excluding this month)
- User statistics ranking within two years (excluding this month)
- User statistics ranking within three years (excluding this month)
2
Abstract:
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of amlodipine and metformin in combination in the treatment of patients with obese-related hypertension. Methods A total of 102 patients with obese-related hypertension were randomly divided into control group and study group, with 51 cases in each group. The control group was treated with amlodipine, while the study group was added with metformin on the basis of the control group. The clinical effects of the two groups after treatment, andconcentrations of serum total cholesterol(TC), triglyceride(TG), low density lipoprotein(LDL-C), high density lipoprotein( HDL-C), fasting blood glucose(FBG), glycated hemoglobin(HbAlc), as well as fasting insulin(FINS)were compared. The insulin sensitivity index(ISI)was calculated. The body mass index(BMI), waist-hip ratio(WHR)before and after treatment, and occurrence of adverse reactions during the treatment were recorded. Results After treatment, the total effective rate and HDL-C concentration in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). Serum TC, TG, LDL-C, FBG, HbAlc, FINS levels, and ISI, BMI, as well as WHR in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions during treatment was lower in the two groups, and there was no significant difference(P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with metformin alone, the combination of amlodipine and metformin in the treatment of patients with obese-related hypertension has a better clinical effect, which can improve blood lipid level, alleviate obesity and insulin resistance, and has higher safety in medication.
Objective To observe the clinical efficacy of amlodipine and metformin in combination in the treatment of patients with obese-related hypertension. Methods A total of 102 patients with obese-related hypertension were randomly divided into control group and study group, with 51 cases in each group. The control group was treated with amlodipine, while the study group was added with metformin on the basis of the control group. The clinical effects of the two groups after treatment, andconcentrations of serum total cholesterol(TC), triglyceride(TG), low density lipoprotein(LDL-C), high density lipoprotein( HDL-C), fasting blood glucose(FBG), glycated hemoglobin(HbAlc), as well as fasting insulin(FINS)were compared. The insulin sensitivity index(ISI)was calculated. The body mass index(BMI), waist-hip ratio(WHR)before and after treatment, and occurrence of adverse reactions during the treatment were recorded. Results After treatment, the total effective rate and HDL-C concentration in the study group were significantly higher than those in the control group(P<0.05). Serum TC, TG, LDL-C, FBG, HbAlc, FINS levels, and ISI, BMI, as well as WHR in the study group were significantly lower than those in the control group(P<0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions during treatment was lower in the two groups, and there was no significant difference(P>0.05). Conclusion Compared with metformin alone, the combination of amlodipine and metformin in the treatment of patients with obese-related hypertension has a better clinical effect, which can improve blood lipid level, alleviate obesity and insulin resistance, and has higher safety in medication.
3
Abstract:
Objective To analyze the types and characteristics of c-kit and platelet derived growth factor receptor A (PDGFRA) gene mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) and their relationships with clinicopathological characteristics of GIST.
Methods The clinicopathological data and tumor tissue specimens of 288 patients with GIST were collected, and the polymerase chain reaction amplification-direct sequencing method was used to detect the mutation status of c-kit (exons 9, 11, 13, 17) and PDGFRA gene (exons 12, 18), and the relationships between mutation types, sites and clinicopathological characteristics were analyzed.
Results Among the 288 GIST cases, 244 cases were primary mutations type (84.72%), 10 cases were secondary drug-resistant mutations type (3.47%), and 34 cases were wild-type (11.81%). Among the 244 patients with primary mutant GIST, there were 231 (94.67%) mutations in the c-kit gene, and the mutations in exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 were 25, 189, 7, and 10 cases, respectively. There were 13 cases with PDGFRA gene mutation, of which exon 12 and 18 mutations were 3 and 10 cases, respectively. Among 189 cases with c-kit gene exon 11 mutations, 111 cases (58.73%) were deletion mutations, 65 cases (34.39%) were point mutations, 3 cases were repeated mutations (1.59%), 4 cases were insertion mutations (2.12%), and 6 cases were mixed mutations (3.17%). The hot spot of exon 11 mutation was codons 557 to 560. The mutation site was related to the primary tumor site, tumor size and mitotic count (P < 0.05). The type of mutation was related to the patient's age, primary site of tumor, tumor size, mitotic count and modified National Institutes of Health (NIH) risk classification (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that GIST patients aged more than 60 years old, with deletion mutations and c-kit exon 11 mutations had an increased risk of modified NIH risk classification by 2.060 (95%CI was 1.066 to 3.980), 3.264 (95%CI was 1.628 to 6.545) and 3.819 (95%CI was 1.585 to 9.205) times.
Conclusion The c-kit and PDGFRA genes in GIST have a high mutation rate and diverse mutation types or sites, which are closely related to the clinicopathology and prognosis of GIST patients, and can provide a reference for the whole-process management of GIST.
4
5
6
Abstract:
Objective To observe the effects of metformin combined therapies on islet function and quality of life in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Methods A total of 122 elderly patients with type 2 diabetes were randomly selected and divided into control group and observation group by random number table method, with 61 cases in each group. The control group was treated with metformin combined with glimepiride. The observation group received metformin combined with dapagliflozin for treatment. Blood glucose indexes[fasting blood glucose (FBG), 2 h postprandial blood glucose (2 hPG), glycated hemoglobin (HbAlc)], fastening insulin (FINS), islet function indexes [insulin resistance index (HOMA-IR), islet β-cell function index (HOMA-β), insulin sensitivity index (ISI)], blood lipid indexes [total cholesterol (TC), triglyceride (TG), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and high density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C)] level and quality of life score [psychological related quality of life (MCS) score and physiological related quality of life (PCS) score] were compared.
Results Before treatment, there were no significant differences in blood glucose indexes, islet function indexes, blood lipid level and quality of life score between two groups (P>0.05). After treatment, the levels of FBG, 2 hPG, HBALC, FINS, TC, TG, LDL-Cand HOMA-IR in two groups were significantly lower than before treatment, while the levels of HDL-C, HOMA-β, ISI, MCS and PCS were significantly higher than before treatment (P < 0.05). After treatment, the levels of FBG, 2 hPG, HBALC, FINS, TC, TG, LDL-C and HOMA-IR in the observation group were significantly lower than those in the control group, and the levels of HDL-C, HOMA-β, ISI, MCS and PCS scores were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.05).
Conclusion Metformin combined with glimepiride or dapagliflozin can effectively control patients′ blood glucose levels, improve patients′ blood lipid levels and pancreatic islet function. Among them, metformin combined with dapagliflozin has a relatively better therapeutic effect and safety. Besides, it can regulate the blood glucose, avoid the occurrence of hypoglycemia and improve patients′ quality of life.
- First
- Prev
- 1
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- Next
- Last
- Total 17 Pages
- To
- Go