Citation: | QIAO Min, XIA Binglan. Clinical features of small intestine and large intestine intussusception in children and their ultrasonic evaluation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(9): 62-64. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20201560 |
Objective To investigate the clinical features of small intestine intussusception and large intestine intussusception in children and evaluation of different intussusception by ultrasonography. Methods The data of 227 children with intussusception was retrospectively analyzed, with the number of 238 intussusception in total. According to clinical characteristics, ultrasound and air enema imaging findings, the patients were divided into small intestine intussusception group (112 intussusception) and large intestine intussusception group (116 intussusception). The clinical features and ultrasonographic features of the two groups were compared. Results The cases of blood in stool and abdominal mass of children with intestinal intussusception were significantly less than those of children with intestinal intussusception (P<0.01). The diameter and length of intussusception in small intestinal intussusception group were significantly shorter than those in large intestinal intussusception group (P<0.01). There was no significant difference in the number of lymph node enlargement between the two groups (P>0.05). The intussusception length of children with air enema was significantly longer, and the number of lymph nodes enlargement was significantly more than that of children with spontaneous remission (P<0.01). When the critical value of intussusception diameter was 2.15 cm, the Youden index was the largest and the screening effect of small intestine intussusception was the best, with the sensitivity of 83.6% and specificity of 92.6%. Conclusion Ultrasound plays an important role in the diagnosis of intestinal intussusception and large intestine intussusception.
[1] |
龙彩云, 白玉作. 儿童小肠套叠的临床特点与治疗进展[J]. 国际儿科学杂志, 2015, 42(5): 511-513. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4408.2015.05.008
|
[2] |
吴东阳, 陈亚军, 彭春辉, 等. 51例儿童术后肠套叠临床分析[J]. 中华小儿外科杂志, 2018, 39(1): 50-52. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-3006.2018.01.011
|
[3] |
宋换地. 小儿肠套叠的超声诊断[J]. 山西医药杂志, 2018, 47(8): 877-878. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0253-9926.2018.08.009
|
[4] |
马岩, 鲁莹, 黄艳智, 等. 腺病毒感染与肠套叠的相关性[J]. 国际儿科学杂志, 2017, 44(07): 507-509. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4408.2017.07.018
|
[5] |
李晓晖, 杨柳, 张艳艳. 彩色多普勒超声检查对小儿常见急腹征的诊断价值[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(21): 29-31, 35. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.202021009
|
[6] |
戚庭月, 孙红光. 小儿小肠型肠套叠的超声诊断分析[J]. 中国医学影像技术, 2008, 24(10): 1619-1621. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1003-3289.2008.10.037
|
[7] |
彭飞, 郑凯, 郭琴, 等. 儿童小肠套叠的诊断与治疗[J]. 中华实用儿科临床杂志, 2017, 32(19): 1510-1511. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-428X.2017.19.017
|
[8] |
吴伟, 石静, 杜隽, 等. 儿童小肠套叠与回结套叠的超声鉴别诊断[J]. 中国医学计算机成像杂志, 2019, 25(3): 289-293. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-5741.2019.03.016
|
[9] |
董娟, 杜建侠, 秦鸣. 超声对儿童回结肠型与小肠型肠套叠的鉴别诊断价值[J]. 临床超声医学杂志, 2018, 20(12): 854-856. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-6978.2018.12.022
|
[10] |
MUNDEN M M, BRUZZI J F, COLEY B D, et al. Sonography of pediatric small-bowel intussusception: differentiating surgical from nonsurgical cases[J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2007, 188(1): 275-279. doi: 10.2214/AJR.05.2049
|
[11] |
任丽丽, 权重禄, 李素贤, 等. 小儿暂时性小肠套叠高频超声影像特点及可能诱因浅析[J]. 中国超声医学杂志, 2011, 27(9): 835-837. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-0101.2011.09.025
|