LYU Yanping, LIANG Qiufeng. Changes of high risk factors for induced abortion in district of Jiading in Shanghai before and after the opening of three-child policy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(23): 69-72. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221698
Citation: LYU Yanping, LIANG Qiufeng. Changes of high risk factors for induced abortion in district of Jiading in Shanghai before and after the opening of three-child policy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(23): 69-72. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221698

Changes of high risk factors for induced abortion in district of Jiading in Shanghai before and after the opening of three-child policy

More Information
  • Received Date: May 30, 2022
  • Available Online: December 22, 2022
  • Objective 

    To analyze the changes of high risk factors of induced abortion women before and after the comprehensively opening of three-child policy.

    Methods 

    Clinical information of pregnant women who underwent high-risk induced abortion from January to December 2021 was retrospectively analyzed. According to the opening time of the three-child policy (July 1, 2021 as the boundary), they were divided into before three-child policy group (n=1 441) and after the three-child policy group (n=1 384). The changes of high risk factors in women with induced abortion were compared and analyzed.

    Results 

    There were statistically significant differences between the two groups in education background, marital status, vaginal delivery history, cesarean section history, multiple abortion history and missed abortion history, postoperative contraceptive methods and unwanted pregnancy (P < 0.05). There was statistical significance between the two groups in the combination of two high risk factors and below (P < 0.05).

    Conclusion 

    With the opening of the three-child policy, women's willingness to give birth gradually increased, and the overall abortion rate is decreased, which is conducive to the protection of female reproductive health.

  • [1]
    顾向应, 车焱. 人工流产和避孕大数据对生育政策放宽后我国计划生育工作的启示[J]. 中国实用妇科与产科杂志, 2018, 34(1): 46-51. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZGSF201801015.htm
    [2]
    袁丽荣. 人工流产现状及流产后计划生育服务分析[J]. 人人健康, 2020(13): 43-45. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-597X.2020.13.024
    [3]
    国家卫生健康委员会. 人工流产后避孕服务规范(2018版)[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2018, 26(10): 888-891. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSY201810001.htm
    [4]
    李相慧. 人工流产后计划生育服务模式效果观察分析[J]. 中国农村卫生, 2017(17): 62-63. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-361X.2017.17.037
    [5]
    中华医学会计划生育学分会. 临床诊疗指南与技术操作规范-计划生育分册[M]. 修订版. 北京: 人民卫生出版社, 2017: 146-147.
    [6]
    GAO K, TU H Z, SUN L J, et al. Impacts of reduced visibility under hazy weather condition on collision risk and car-following behavior: implications for traffic control and management[J]. Int J Sustain Transp, 2020, 14(8): 635-642. doi: 10.1080/15568318.2019.1597226
    [7]
    吕燕萍, 梁秋峰. 全面二孩政策前后上海某区流动人口中育龄妇女反复人工流产率的调查及影响因素分析[J]. 中国临床医学, 2018, 25(4): 668-670. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCYX201804035.htm
    [8]
    蒋莉, 范茹丽, 黄霄. 流产后关爱服务对避免女性重复流产的影响及效果评价[J]. 海军医学杂志, 2020(2): 222-224. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-HJYX202002034.htm
    [9]
    LUNDGREN I, SMITH V, NILSSON C, et al. Clinician-centred interventions to increase vaginal birth after Caesarean section (VBAC): a systematic review[J]. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 2015, 15: 16. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0441-3
    [10]
    NAVAEE M, ABEDIAN Z. Effect of role play education on primiparous women's fear of natural delivery and their decision on the mode of delivery[J]. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res, 2015, 20(1): 40-46.
    [11]
    张媛媛, 陈素文, 王珺, 等. 人工流产高危因素和重复人工流产高风险因素动态监测[J]. 中国计划生育学杂志, 2021, 29(4): 755-758. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-JHSY202104028.htm
    [12]
    张丽萍, 杨玉娇, 曾雯琼, 等. 剖宫产术后再次妊娠经阴道分娩成功的因素及母婴结局分析[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2018, 22(7): 78-81. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201807021
    [13]
    施美萍, 闵玉梅. 剖宫产术后再次妊娠人工流产临床分析[J]. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志, 2018, 5(11): 40-41. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-FKDZ201811024.htm
    [14]
    吕燕萍, 梁秋峰. 2010-2019年上海市嘉定区妇幼保健院高龄多次人工流产者现状及避孕方式的选择[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2020, 24(20): 83-86. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.202020023
    [15]
    王茹. 人工流产与药物流产对初次妊娠妇女再次妊娠分娩的影响[J]. 母婴世界, 2018(24): 33. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-SYIY201916013.htm
    [16]
    ACOG practice bulletin no. 200 summary: early pregnancy loss[J]. Obstet Gynecol, 2018, 132(5): 1311-1313.
    [17]
    李丽, 张羽, 李红梅. 白介素-17、白介素-35在稽留流产患者血清中的表达及临床意义[J]. 实用临床医药杂志, 2019, 23(15): 90-92. doi: 10.7619/jcmp.201915024
    [18]
    汪敏, 施晓芸, 王家俊. 身心协调舒适性护理在稽留流产患者中应用的效果观察[J]. 天津护理, 2019, 27(1): 113-115. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-TJFN201901039.htm
    [19]
    SHORTER J M, ATRIO J M, SCHREIBER C A. Management of early pregnancy loss, with a focus on patient centered care[J]. Semin Perinatol, 2019, 43(2): 84-94.
    [20]
    中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会, 国家卫生计生副主任王培安就实施全面两孩政策答记者[EB/OL]. (2015-10-30)[2016-7-10]. http://www.nhfpc.gov.cn/zhuzhan/zcjd/201510/b03bbb9da18044c299f673f0b84eeab1.shtml.
  • Related Articles

    [1]ZHAO Yongfeng, GAN Guocai, WANG Xue, ZHAO Xu, MA Shumei, LI Caiqin, ZHANG Cheng. Predictive value of color Doppler ultrasound parameters for fetal growth restriction induced by gestational hypertension in high-altitude regions[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(20): 112-118. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20241944
    [2]XIE Qiong, FENG Hua, LIN Yan, LI Nan. Changes and significance of Doppler flow velocity curve parameters of the main pulmonary artery in fetuses of pregnant women with early-onset severe preeclampsia[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(20): 108-111. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20241210
    [3]ZHANG Wenjing, GAN Jianhe. Predictive value of age combined with albumin-bilirubin score for overt hepatic encephalopathy after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(5): 53-58. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20233228
    [4]ZHU Wenli, WANG Dongling, HOU Sicong, LI Jiajia. Chinese version of the Nine-Item Avoidant/Restrictive Food Intake Disorder Scale in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a test of reliability and validity[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(1): 108-112, 117. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20233187
    [5]HUANG Qiaoling, WANG Lin. Value of growth factor combined with uterine artery flow parameters in predicting fetal growth restriction during pregnancy in patients with hypertension[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(16): 107-110. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20231912
    [6]DONG Zhishuang, LI Guangyuan, LIU Wen, KONG Fanxin, WANG Yonghuai, MA Chunyan. Research progress on evaluation of arterial stiffness by pulse wave velocity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea hypopnea syndrome[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(5): 135-138. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20213566
    [7]SHI Yan, WANG Yuanyuan, LIU Xuedong, BAI Ya, MA Lei, LI Wen. Effect of sleep restriction therapy in patients with insomnia disorder comorbid to Parkinson's disease[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2021, 25(23): 49-52. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20214395
    [8]LI Yunduan, LIU Weiwu, XU Xiuying. Multivariate analysis of fetal growth restriction and its prevention measures[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2017, (1): 90-93. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201701027
    [9]CAO Hongzhen, BIAN Min, LI Qin, SHEN Jianqiu. Value of color Dopper ultrasonic examination in monitoring fetal renal artery blood flow parameters of patients with pregnancy-inducedhypertension syndrome and fetal growth restriction[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (17): 94-96. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201417029
    [10]GAO Mingjun, QI Bo. Influence of irbesartan and amlodipine on carotid-femoral artery pulse wave velocity and serum matrix metalloproteinase-9 level in patients with primary hypertension[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2013, (23): 12-14,18. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201323004
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(14)

    1. 何林怡,龚晓雪,宋丹丹,杨红灵. 宫颈癌筛查异常人群实施阴道镜下宫颈活检的准确性及漏诊因素分析. 中国药物滥用防治杂志. 2025(01): 38-40+54 .
    2. 陆安. 阴道镜联合TCT、HPV检查对宫颈癌及宫颈鳞状上皮内病变的诊断价值. 系统医学. 2023(01): 167-170 .
    3. 刘钰,王君梅. 阴道镜下宫颈活检诊断宫颈上皮内瘤变的准确性及其漏诊宫颈癌的影响因素. 贵州医药. 2022(01): 137-138 .
    4. 伍世端,张旗炘,梁燕梅,梁惠虹. 围绝经期宫颈上皮内瘤变合并阴道上皮内瘤变的相关高危因素分析. 中国医药科学. 2022(14): 122-125 .
    5. 卢国英,付汐,吴彬. 阴道镜下宫颈活检病理诊断宫颈鳞状上皮内病变的价值研究. 中国社区医师. 2022(26): 67-69 .
    6. 王苏莉,熊锋宝. 胃镜活检病理检查在HGIN患者中的临床价值分析. 现代诊断与治疗. 2022(16): 2441-2444 .
    7. 林楠,张英,蔡锦梅. 探讨阴道镜活检诊断宫颈高级别鳞状上皮内病变的价值及影响诊断准确率的相关因素. 实用妇科内分泌电子杂志. 2022(04): 48-50 .
    8. 石鑫,宋风丽,史伟,郅玲玲,贺笑茜,于帅,马丽丽,高万里. 阴道镜下宫颈活检对HSIL和宫颈浸润癌的诊断价值及宫颈浸润癌漏诊的影响因素. 医学综述. 2021(10): 2035-2039 .
    9. 李兴中. 阴道镜联合LEEP术对宫颈上皮内瘤变的临床诊疗价值研究. 智慧健康. 2021(20): 92-94 .
    10. 张勇,张宏鹁. 宫颈鳞状上皮肿瘤的病理诊断效果. 黑龙江中医药. 2021(04): 103-104 .
    11. 顾静凤,张菊平. 阴道镜及活组织检查对早期宫颈上皮内瘤变诊断价值的分析. 中国卫生标准管理. 2021(21): 26-29 .
    12. 涂萍,付杰娇. 阴道镜下宫颈环形电切术治疗宫颈低级别鳞状上皮内病变患者的临床效果. 医疗装备. 2021(22): 75-76 .
    13. 毛莉,王俊. 阴道镜下宫颈活检对宫颈病变的诊断价值. 中国实用医刊. 2020(16): 53-55 .
    14. 高祖标,叶小凤,林思瑶. HSIL患者LEEP术后2年复发Logistic回归分析. 中国病案. 2020(10): 84-87 .

    Other cited types(1)

Catalog

    Article views (151) PDF downloads (3) Cited by(15)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return