YANG Tianshuang, WANG Maohua, WANG Qian, PENG Rui, LIU Hanqin, ZHANG Jianyou, SUN Jianhong. Feasibility of using remimazolam alone in painless gastroscopy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(21): 127-130, 135. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221410
Citation: YANG Tianshuang, WANG Maohua, WANG Qian, PENG Rui, LIU Hanqin, ZHANG Jianyou, SUN Jianhong. Feasibility of using remimazolam alone in painless gastroscopy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(21): 127-130, 135. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221410

Feasibility of using remimazolam alone in painless gastroscopy

More Information
  • Received Date: April 28, 2022
  • Available Online: November 17, 2022
  • Objective 

    To explore the feasibility of using remimazolam alone in painless gastroscopy.

    Methods 

    A total of 350 patients undergoing painless gastroscopy were selected as study objects, and they were Ⅰ to Ⅱ grade of American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification. They were randomly divided into seven groups, with 50 patients per group. Group R1, group R2, group R3, group R4, group R5, and group R6 were respectively injected 0.30, 0.35, 0.40, 0.45, 0.50 and 0.55 mg/kg of remimazolam, while control group injected 2 mg/kg of propofol intravenously. The dosage of 30 to 50 mg of propofol was added if the patient had obvious cough or body movement reaction during the operation. The success rates of sedation of different groups were recorded, and the mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were observed before drug administration and 1 min after drug administration. The occurrence of adverse reactions such as cough, body movement, hiccup, hypoxemia, injection pain, gastroscopy time, awakening time and discharge time were observed in each group.

    Results 

    The success rates of sedation in the R1, R2, R3, R4 and R5 groups were 16.0%, 34.0%, 38.0%, 48.0% and 58.0%, respectively, which were lower than 82.0% in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in sedation success rate between R6 group (72.0%) and control group (P>0.05). Compared with the control group, the incidence rates of cough, body movement and hiccup in the R1, R2, R3, R4, R5 and R6 groups were increased, the incidence rates of hypoxemia and injection pain were decreased, and the time of leaving hospital was prolonged, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The awakening time of the R2 group, R3 group, R4 group, R5 group and R6 group were (13.0±3.9) min, (14.6±5.0) min, (16.2±6.5) min, (17.5±5.4) min and (20.2±7.2) min, respectively, which were all longer than (10.0±3.3) min in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The HR changes in the R1, R2, R3, R4, R5 and R6 groups were higher than those in the control group, and the differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05).

    Conclusion 

    In painless gastroscopy, the sedation success rate of rematazolam alone is positively correlated with dosage, and the sedation success rate of rematazolam alone at a dosage of 0.55 mg/kg is comparable to that of propofol at a dose of 2 mg/kg. However, rematazolam can increase the incidence rates of cough, body movement and hiccup, and prolong the awakening time and discharge time.

  • [1]
    WADHWA V, ISSA D, GARG S, et al. Similar risk of cardiopulmonary adverse events between propofol and traditional anesthesia for gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2017, 15(2): 194-206. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2016.07.013
    [2]
    ANTONIK L J, GOLDWATER D R, KILPATRICK G J, et al. A placebo- and midazolam-controlled phase I single ascending-dose study evaluating the safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056): part I. Safety, efficacy, and basic pharmacokinetics[J]. Anesth Analg, 2012, 115(2): 274-283. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31823f0c28
    [3]
    中华医学会麻醉学分会, 中华医学会消化内镜学分会. 中国消化内镜诊疗镇静/麻醉的专家共识[J]. 临床麻醉学杂志, 2014, 30(9): 920-927. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-LCMZ201409034.htm
    [4]
    王春艳, 于泳浩. 瑞马唑仑临床研究进展[J]. 中华麻醉学杂志, 2019, 39(3): 261-263. https://www.cnki.com.cn/Article/CJFDTOTAL-ZZYD202101012.htm
    [5]
    POLVERINO M, POLVERINO F, FASOLINO M, et al. Anatomy and neuro-pathophysiology of the cough reflex arc[J]. Multidiscip Respir Med, 2012, 7(1): 5. doi: 10.1186/2049-6958-7-5
    [6]
    JUNG S M, CHO C K. The effects of deep and light propofol anesthesia on stress response in patients undergoing open lung surgery: a randomized controlled trial[J]. Korean J Anesthesiol, 2015, 68(3): 224-231. doi: 10.4097/kjae.2015.68.3.224
    [7]
    LIU C C, LU C Y, CHANGCHIEN C F, et al. Sedation-associated hiccups in adults undergoing gastrointestinal endoscopy and colonoscopy[J]. World J Gastroenterol, 2012, 18(27): 3595-3601. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i27.3595
    [8]
    SCHVTTLER J, EISENRIED A, LERCH M, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of remimazolam (CNS 7056) after continuous infusion in healthy male volunteers: part I. pharmacokinetics and clinical pharmacodynamics[J]. Anesthesiology, 2020, 132(4): 636-651.
    [9]
    BRANDT J, LEONG C. Benzodiazepines and Z-drugs: an updated review of major adverse outcomes reported on in epidemiologic research[J]. Drugs R D, 2017, 17(4): 493-507. doi: 10.1007/s40268-017-0207-7
    [10]
    KLEIMAN R B, DARPO B, THORN M, et al. Potential strategy for assessing QT/QTc interval for drugs that produce rapid changes in heart rate: Electrocardiographic assessment of the effects of intravenous remimazolam on cardiac repolarization[J]. Br J Clin Pharmacol, 2020, 86(8): 1600-1609. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14270
  • Related Articles

    [1]FANG Zhiyong, QIU Xiaojuan, FENG Tao, BIAN Qingming. Effective dose and safety of ciprofol in combination with butorphanol for painless gastroscopy in elderly patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2024, 28(12): 82-85. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20234289
    [2]LIU Hanqin, PENG Rui, WANG Maohua, ZHANG Jianyou, GUO Miao, ZHU Yue, CHEN Maogui. Application effect of remimazolam combined with fentanyl in painless gastroscopy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2023, 27(11): 133-136. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20230082
    [3]JU Mi, CHEN Zhilin, WANG Yang, HE Zhiwei. Influence of early goal-directed sedation strategy on incidence of delirium and sedation effect in critically ill patients with mechanical ventilation[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2022, 26(20): 45-47, 52. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.20221326
    [4]ZHANG Shuyan, WANG Jing, AN Ning. Application of standardized sedative nursing in patients in Intensive Care Unit[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(9): 47-49. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202009014
    [5]SHAO Yingyin, CHEN Lifang, LIN Fanju, ZHANG Yaping. Effect of auricular point pressing therapy on scores of Confusion Assessment Method for Intensive Care Unit and Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale in patients with delirium in ICU[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2020, 24(2): 41-44. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.202002012
    [6]SUN Jun, TONG Chunting, YIN Zhichun. Effects of dexmedetomidine combined with rufentanil on sedation and analgesia in treatment of ICU patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (13): 104-105,108. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201813031
    [7]LIU Zhigang, GONG Haitao. Clinical efficiency and safety of painless gastroscopy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2018, (9): 101-103. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201809028
    [8]XU Chanling, WU Hanyu, SUN Yean. Effect of nursing intervention in elderly patients with painless gastroscopy[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2014, (10): 46-48. DOI: 10.7619/jcmp.201410016
    [9]HOU Guang-hui, HE Qi-yue. Effects of different target effect- site concentrations of remifentanil on propofol sedation in patients[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2012, (7): 39-41. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2353.2012.07.011
    [10]CORRELATION OF ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC ENTROPY WITH LEVEL OF PROPOFOL SEDATION[J]. Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice, 2006, (5): 47-48,52. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2353.2006.05.013
  • Cited by

    Periodical cited type(5)

    1. 张亚敏. 血清心肌肌钙蛋白T、C反应蛋白水平与维持性血液透析患者预后的相关性. 河南医学研究. 2021(06): 1005-1007 .
    2. 叶文捷. 维持性血液透析患者血清铁蛋白水平与临床预后的相关性研究. International Infections Diseases(Electronic Edition). 2020(01): 1-3 .
    3. 董雄军,汤迎春,汪正翔,唐丽娟. 维持性血液透析患者血压变异性、血清cTnT及CRP与预后的相关性分析. 中国中西医结合肾病杂志. 2020(11): 1015-1016 .
    4. 郭颖,冯海晴,钱锋,房向东. 腹膜透析和血液透析对尿毒症患者血清肌钙蛋白TI及钙磷代谢的影响. 基层医学论坛. 2019(17): 2437-2438 .
    5. 徐道祥,史惠敏,林小东. 维持性血液透析患者精神心理状况分析及其与血清色氨酸水平的相关性研究. 中国现代医生. 2018(02): 1-3+11 .

    Other cited types(0)

Catalog

    Article views (166) PDF downloads (13) Cited by(5)

    /

    DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
    Return
    Return